Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-41-3
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-41-3
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
40 (
4
); 236-239
doi:
10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_170_24

Unusual Gastric Metastasis from Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Breast Mimicking as Metachronous Primary on 18F-FDG PET/CT

Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Department of Surgical Oncology, St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Department of Medical Oncology, St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Department of Pathology, St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Chandra Teja Reddy Singareddy, Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. E-mail: chandratejareddy.dr@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

The most common metastatic sites from carcinoma breast include the bones, lungs, liver, and brain. Breast cancer metastasizing to the gastrointestinal tract is very rare. This case report is about a compliant woman who was a known treated case of right breast cancer, in whom 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography showed a focal FDG avid mural thickening in the body of stomach 4 years later, for which suspicion of a second primary of gastric origin was raised, considering the rarity of being metastatic. However, histopathology confirmed it as metastasis of breast origin. This case highlights the importance of considering gastric metastasis as a differential diagnosis in patients who present with a gastric lesion and a history of breast cancer.

Keywords

Breast cancer
ductal carcinoma breast
fluorodeoxyglucose
gastric metastasis
positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common primary malignancy in women. The most common sites of metastatic disease include the bones, lungs, liver, and brain. Breast cancer metastasizing to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is rare, with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) being the predominant histologic subtype to show that tendency.[1]

The mean interval from primary breast cancer diagnosis to gastric metastasis is reported to be around 5–7 years.[2] Even in patients with a known history of breast cancer, it may be difficult to attribute them to a common cause due to this long latency.

In this report, we present an uncommon case of gastric metastasis in a patient with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) breast, which was suspected to be a gastric primary on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). This case highlights the importance of considering gastric metastasis as a differential diagnosis in patients who present with a gastric lesion and a history of breast cancer.

Case Report

A woman in her early 40s was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the right breast, with a favorable molecular subtype – luminal B (ER +, PR +, HER2/neu –) with a Ki67 index 30% [Figure 1]. She underwent breast conservative surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy including four cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide, followed by four cycles of taxane-based chemotherapy. She also received adjuvant radiation therapy to the rest of the right breast parenchyma (4272 cGy over 16 fractions with tumor bed boost of 1250 cGy over 5 fractions) with concurrent tamoxifen 20 mg once daily, which was later changed to tablet anastrozole 1 mg once daily. She also received bisphosphonates (injection zoledronic acid 4 mg intravenous) regularly every 6 months. She was compliant with the scheduled treatment and follow-up, showing no signs of disease recurrence.

(a) Invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the breast with tubular pattern (H and E, ×40), (b) Neoplastic cells with moderate pleomorphism and frequent mitoses (H and E, ×400), neoplastic cells express estrogen receptor (inset)
Figure 1 (a) Invasive ductal adenocarcinoma of the breast with tubular pattern (H and E, ×40), (b) Neoplastic cells with moderate pleomorphism and frequent mitoses (H and E, ×400), neoplastic cells express estrogen receptor (inset)

Four years later, she developed loss of appetite and pain in her upper abdomen. 18F-FDG PET CT whole body scan was done which revealed multiple FDG avid right axillary and subpectoral lymph nodes with no definite suspicious lesions in the residual right breast. Along with them, focal FDG avid mural thickening along the greater curvature of the stomach was noted with multiple lymph nodes, liver, lung, adrenal, ovarian, and skeletal lesions with peritoneal carcinomatosis [Figure 2]. Suspicion of a second primary gastric neoplasm with disseminated metastases was raised due to the morphological resemblance of the gastric lesion to be a primary. Metastatic breast carcinoma was thought to be unlikely due to clinically favorable sub-type and initial good response to treatment. However, the gastric biopsy revealed metastatic carcinoma from the breast, with IHC analysis positive for ER, PR, CK 7, GATA and negative for HER2/neu and CK 20 [Figure 3]. She was started on palliative chemotherapy; however, succumbed to the disease 6 months after the diagnosis of metastatic disease.

Maximum intensity projection (a) and representative coronal (b), sagittal (c and d), and axial (e and f) images of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and fused positron emission tomography/CT images showing focal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avid enhancing nodular mural thickening along the greater curvature of the stomach (highlighted in red arrows). FDG avid disseminated disease also seen involving lymph nodes (green), liver (blue), ovaries (yellow), and bones (orange) with omental caking (purple) and ascites
Figure 2 Maximum intensity projection (a) and representative coronal (b), sagittal (c and d), and axial (e and f) images of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and fused positron emission tomography/CT images showing focal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avid enhancing nodular mural thickening along the greater curvature of the stomach (highlighted in red arrows). FDG avid disseminated disease also seen involving lymph nodes (green), liver (blue), ovaries (yellow), and bones (orange) with omental caking (purple) and ascites
Gastric mucosal biopsy with infiltrating neoplastic cells in the lamina propria. Overlying foveolar mucosa is unremarkable (H and E, ×200). Neoplastic cells express CK7, GATA3 with weak expression of estrogen receptor (×200)
Figure 3 Gastric mucosal biopsy with infiltrating neoplastic cells in the lamina propria. Overlying foveolar mucosa is unremarkable (H and E, ×200). Neoplastic cells express CK7, GATA3 with weak expression of estrogen receptor (×200)

Discussion

In breast carcinoma, metastatic patterns of ductal and lobular subtypes have been reported to differ significantly. Ductal carcinoma most frequently metastasizes to the bone, lungs, liver, and brain, while lobular carcinoma has a relatively greater propensity to GI tract, gynecological organs, and the peritoneum.[3] The estimated rate of breast-to-stomach metastasis is variable with as low as 0.3% reported in a retrospective series of 12,001 patients with carcinoma breast.[4] Due to the low incidence, only sporadic cases and few small series of gastric metastases from breast cancer had been reported. Taal et al. reported a series of 51 patients with gastric metastases from breast carcinoma, which included ILC (n = 36; 70.6%), IDC (n = 10; 19.6%), and other subtypes (n = 5; 9.8%), confirming the preponderance of ILC subtype.[5] In a similar case series of 35 patients, Almubarak et al. reported that 97% (n = 34) had the ILC subtype.[6]

Gastric metastasis from the breast primary is often a part of a disseminated disease. Taal et al.[5] reported that up to 94% of breast carcinoma patients with gastric metastasis show disseminated disease, mostly involving the skeleton (60%), liver (20%), and also the lungs (18%). Almubarak et al.[6] reported 28% patients had bone metastases and 45% had peritoneal carcinomatosis at the time of detection of gastric metastases.

The most common radiological pattern of breast cancer metastasis to the stomach is a linitis plastica appearance (72.6%) with diffuse infiltration of the submucosa and muscularis propria.[7] Solitary lesions were more commonly observed than multiple lesions.[2]

18F-FDG PET/CT is a useful imaging tool for staging locally advanced breast cancer, locoregional or metastatic recurrence, and treatment response evaluation. However, its sensitivity is reported to be relatively lower for the diagnosis of gastric neoplasms compared to other cancer types due to nonspecific FDG uptake due to gastric peristalsis or mucosal inflammation, leading to false positives. Moreover, 18F-FDG may appear false negative in some malignant conditions like GI tumors with more signet ring cells and mucinous tissue.[8]

The incidence of gastric metastases in clinical and autopsy series is reported to vary between 0.2% and 1.7%. Due to this rarity and nonspecificity of symptoms, gastric metastases are often misdiagnosed, and patients are not treated promptly. The mechanisms underlying gastric metastasis have not been clearly understood and are probably different for each primary tumor. Malignant melanoma is the most frequently metastasized tumor to the stomach (27%–30%). It is followed by lung (18.9%), breast (13.5%; predominantly lobular subtype), and esophageal (8.1%) carcinoma, even though the risk is reported to be very low.[910]

Our case of gastric metastasis from carcinoma breast shares similarities with findings in literature such as disseminated presentation and late occurrence. However, it is of interest for three main reasons. First, metastasis to the stomach from IDC is very rare. Second, the Luminal B subtype which is generally considered to have a good prognosis showed disseminated metastasis (including stomach) within 4 years of diagnosis and the patient died within 6 months after the diagnosis of metastatic disease. Third, the appearance of gastric metastasis is like a discrete FDG avid mural thickening in the stomach, unlike the most frequently reported linitis plastica morphology.

Conclusion

Although gastric metastasis of breast carcinoma is uncommon, clinicians may encounter them, as the prevalence of breast cancer is increasing with more screening and advanced treatment. In patients with a history of breast cancer, a high index of suspicion for potential metastasis to the stomach should be maintained when new GI symptoms develop or when suspicious gastric lesions are seen on imaging modalities.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Breast cancer metastasis to the gastrointestinal tract with unusual endoscopic and histologic presentations. ACG Case Rep J. 2022;9:e00938.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Gastric metastasis 5 years after primary invasive lobular adenocarcinoma of the breast. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2023;17:221-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Gastric metastases originating from breast cancer: Report of 8 cases and review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:4759-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Metastatic gastric cancer from breast carcinoma: A report of 78 cases. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:4069-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Clinical presentation, endoscopic features, and treatment of gastric metastases from breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;89:2214-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Gastric metastasis of breast cancer: A single centre retrospective study. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43:823-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Gastrointestinal metastases of breast carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:103-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Gastric metastasis from invasive lobular breast cancer, resembling primary gastric cancer. J Nucl Med Technol. 2024;52:68-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Clinical and endoscopic features of metastatic tumors in the stomach. Gut Liver. 2015;9:615-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Metastatic tumors to the stomach: Analysis of 54 patients diagnosed at endoscopy and 347 autopsy cases. Endoscopy. 2001;33:507-10.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections