Translate this page into:
Unexpectedly Low FDG and FAPI Uptake in Mucosal Melanoma: Case Report with Literature Review
Address for correspondence: Dr. Nimmagadda Ajit, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Banjara Hills, Road No. 10, Hyderabad - 500 034, Telangana, India. E-mail: ajit.nimmagadda@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Mucosal melanomas (MMs) represent a rare subset of melanomas arising from melanocytes in noncutaneous sites such as mucosal membranes of the head-and-neck, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tracts. Unlike cutaneous melanomas, MMs often present late due to their occult nature, leading to a poor prognosis. Fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is widely utilized for staging and monitoring melanomas, leveraging their characteristic high FDG avidity. Recently, fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-based PET/CT imaging has become a popular modality in the evaluation of various cancers. Here, we present a case of MM where FDG avidity was notably absent and mild FAPI avidity, despite the lesion’s typical anatomical location and clinical suspicion. This case highlights an uncommon scenario within the literature and underscores the variability in radiotracer uptake observed in MMs, challenging conventional imaging expectations and potentially impacting clinical management decisions.
Keywords
Fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography
fibroblast activation protein inhibitor
mucosal melanoma
oral melanoma
Introduction
Mucosal melanomas (MMs) originate from melanocytes in extracutaneous sites such as mucosal membranes of the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urogenital tracts. In the head and neck, MM can arise from the mucosal lining of the nasal cavity, sinuses, and oral cavity, as well as from ocular melanocytes and leptomeninges.[1] These primary MMs are rare constituting 0.4%–2% of all malignant melanomas and 4%–10% of head-and-neck melanomas.[234] Their occult nature and late detection contribute to their poor prognosis.
Noncutaneous melanomas (NCMs) are categorized by origin: ocular, mucosal, or unknown primary. Ocular melanomas arise from the uvea or conjunctiva, while MMs can develop in various mucosal surfaces including the head-and-neck (oral cavity, nasal, and paranasal sinuses) and gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts. NCMs, including ocular and MMs, collectively represent a small fraction of melanoma cases.[56] Unlike cutaneous melanomas, which are linked to sun exposure, the etiology of MM remains poorly understood due to their origin on sun-shielded mucosal linings.[7]
Melanomas typically exhibit high uptake of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), facilitating their detection via positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and aiding in the assessment of lymph node metastases.[8] 18F-FDG PET/CT has demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity in detecting both visceral and nonvisceral metastases compared to conventional imaging methods, thereby influencing treatment decisions in a significant percentage of cases.[8]
18F-FDG PET/CT had 100% sensitivity and specificity for the detection of the primary.[9] Here, we report a case of MM notable for its lack of FDG avidity, which appears to be a rare phenomenon in the literature.
Case Report
A 22-year-old male patient came with complaints of blackish discoloration of the tongue for 5 years. No other specific complaints were present. On examination, a nodular lesion black in color was observed on the dorsal surface of the right half of the tongue, measuring approximately 6 cm × 4 cm [Figure 1]. 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was performed in suspicion of MM, which showed no obvious lesion in the tongue. A Gallium-68 fibroblast activation protein inhibitor 46 (Ga-68 FAPI-46) PET/CT scan was also performed that demonstrated mild FAPI avidity of the lesion [Figure 2]. Biopsy was performed, and histopathological examination along with immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of MM [Figure 3].



Discussion
Unlike cutaneous melanomas, which predominantly arise from the sun-exposed skin, the pathogenesis of MM remains less understood due to their occurrence in sun-protected mucosal linings. This distinct anatomical location contributes to their late detection and poor prognosis compared to cutaneous melanomas.[7]
18F-FDG PET/CT plays a pivotal role in the management of melanomas by detecting primary lesions, evaluating lymph node involvement, and assessing distant metastases. The high FDG avidity typically observed in melanoma cells, driven by increased glucose metabolism, supports the sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting melanoma lesions and influencing treatment decisions.[10] Cutaneous melanoma exhibits elevated levels of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), which are influenced by external factors such as prolonged exposure to ultraviolet rays. This leads to high FAPI expression in cutaneous melanomas. However, this mechanism might not be consistent in cases of MM, leading to varying levels of FAPI uptake.[11]
In our presented case, we describe a patient diagnosed with MM where FDG avidity was notably absent in the lesion. This atypical finding challenges the conventional expectation of high FDG uptake in melanomas and raises important considerations regarding the interpretation of 18F-FDG PET/CT in MMs. The absence of FDG avidity and mild FAPI avidity in our case suggests potential biological differences in glucose metabolism and CAFs expression within MMs compared to cutaneous counterparts.
Studies have implicated the role of glucose transporter (GLUT) proteins, particularly GLUT receptors, in facilitating FDG uptake in various cancers, including melanomas.[12] These receptors play a crucial role in transporting glucose into tumor cells, where it undergoes phosphorylation and traps FDG, thus enabling its detection via PET imaging. Furthermore, factors such as cell viability and rate of cell proliferation, as well as hexokinase expression, were directly responsible for glucose uptake.[13]
Genetic studies have highlighted differences between cutaneous and MMs, with mucosal variants showing a lower frequency of B-rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma and N-rat sarcoma mutations but higher rates of SF3B1 and tyrosine kinase receptor (KIT) mutations.[1415] These genetic variations could influence GLUT expression and metabolic activity, potentially contributing to the observed variability in FDG uptake patterns seen in clinical practice.[16]
Clinically, the absence of radiotracer avidity complicates the accurate staging and management of MMs, as PET/CT imaging forms a cornerstone in treatment planning and monitoring response to therapy. This underscores the importance of integrating clinical, radiological, and molecular data to tailor individualized treatment strategies for patients with MMs.
Further research is warranted to elucidate the biological mechanisms underlying CAF expression and FDG uptake variability in MMs, including the specific roles of GLUT receptors and their molecular pathways. Investigating factors such as tumor microenvironment, molecular subtype, and glucose metabolism pathways may provide insights into optimizing imaging protocols and improving diagnostic accuracy in this challenging malignancy.
In conclusion, while PET/CT imaging remains indispensable in the management of melanomas, including mucosal variants, our case highlights the nuanced interpretation required when FDG avidity is unexpectedly absent. This emphasizes the evolving landscape of personalized medicine and the ongoing need for comprehensive multidisciplinary approaches in the care of patients with MMs.
Conclusion
This case underscores the variability in FDG and FAPI avidity observed in MMs, despite their typically high uptake of the radiotracer. Further research is warranted to understand the underlying factors contributing to such variability and its implications for diagnostic imaging and treatment planning in these rare and challenging malignancies.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Nil.
References
- The distribution of melanocytes in the leptomeninges of the human brain. J Invest Dermatol. 1984;82:235-8.
- [Google Scholar]
- Experience with mucosal melanoma of the nose and paranasal sinuses. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:192-7.
- [Google Scholar]
- Sinonasal tract and nasopharyngeal melanomas: A clinicopathologic study of 115 cases with a proposed staging system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:594-611.
- [Google Scholar]
- Outcome of sinonasal melanoma: Clinical experience and review of the literature. Head Neck. 2010;32:1385-92.
- [Google Scholar]
- Diagnostic performance of whole body dual modality 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for N- and M-staging of malignant melanoma: Experience with 250 consecutive patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1178-87.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clinical impact of (18) F-FDG PET-CT in recurrent stage III/IV melanoma: A tertiary centre specialist skin cancer multidisciplinary team (SSMDT) experience. Insights Imaging. 2013;4:701-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Primary mucosal melanomas: A comprehensive review. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2012;5:739-53.
- [Google Scholar]
- Non-cutaneous melanoma: Is there a role for (18) F-FDG PET-CT? Br J Radiol. 2014;87:20140324.
- [Google Scholar]
- Positron emission tomography in mucosal melanomas of head and neck: Results from a South Asian tertiary cancer care center. World J Nucl Med. 2017;16:197-201.
- [Google Scholar]
- Routine use of FDG-PET scans in melanoma patients with positive sentinel node biopsy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:887-92.
- [Google Scholar]
- Variability in glucose transporter-1 levels and hexokinase activity in human melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2002;12:35-43.
- [Google Scholar]
- Factors influencing [F-18] 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (F-18 FDG) uptake in melanoma cells: The role of proliferation rate, viability, glucose transporter expression and hexokinase activity. J Dermatol. 2005;32:316-34.
- [Google Scholar]
- Whole-genome landscape of mucosal melanoma reveals diverse drivers and therapeutic targets. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3163.
- [Google Scholar]
- GLUT1, GLUT3 expression and 18FDG-PET/CT in human malignant melanoma: What relationship exists? New insights and perspectives. Cells. 2021;10:3090.
- [Google Scholar]
