Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
41 (
2
); 199-209
doi:
10.25259/IJNM_160_25

Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Diabetes Mellitus: Current Applications and Emerging Molecular Targets

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostic Molecular, School of Medicine, Universitas Padjajaran, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia

*Corresponding author: Dr. Raydel Briankwee Amalo, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostic Molecular, School of Medicine, Universitas Padjajaran, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung 40161, Indonesia. ray_amalo@hotmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Amalo RB, Harahap RR, Budiawan H. Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Diabetes Mellitus: Current Applications and Emerging Molecular Targets. Indian J Nucl Med. 2026;41:199-209. doi:10.25259/IJNM_160_25

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disease with complications such as cardiovascular disease, neuropathy, nephropathy, and infections. Early detection and personalized interventions are crucial for optimal management. Nuclear medicine techniques such as positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography play a key role in early diagnosis and assessment of DM complications, including diabetic foot infections, myocardial perfusion abnormalities, renal dysfunction, and peripheral arterial disease. This review also explores emerging radiotracers for β-cell imaging, glucose metabolism, and inflammation. These imaging tools enable a deeper understanding of diabetes pathophysiology and support precision medicine, enhancing early detection, risk stratification, and individualized treatment.

Keywords

β-cell imaging
Diabetes mellitus
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor
inflammation
Nuclear medicine
VMAT2

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus (DM) refers to a group of common metabolic disorders characterized by the phenotype of hyperglycemia. Several types of DM result from a complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors. Depending on its etiology, the contributing mechanisms to hyperglycemia may include reduced insulin secretion, impaired glucose utilisation, and increased glucose production.[1] According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 422 million people worldwide are living with diabetes, with the majority residing in low- and middle-income countries. Each year, 1.5 million deaths are directly attributed to diabetes.[2] In the United States, DM is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease, nontraumatic lower-limb amputations, and adult-onset blindness.[2] Moreover, individuals with diabetes are at significantly higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease, which remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this population.[1] In Indonesia, diabetes-related mortality reached 6% in 2016.[3]

This review aims to explore the role and potential benefits of nuclear medicine imaging in the management of DM.

Current Nuclear Medicine Applications in Diabetes

INuclear medicine plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of diabetes through various imaging techniques and therapeutic approaches. Nuclear imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can be utilized to detect diabetes-related complications. These include identifying areas of inflammation or infection, which are common in diabetic patients, assessing pancreatic beta-cell function, evaluating cardiovascular risk, monitoring renal impairment, and diagnosing diabetic foot complications.

Radiopharmaceuticals can also be used for targeted therapy in diabetes management. For instance, targeted radionuclide therapy using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs may be applied in treating neuroendocrine tumors associated with conditions such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, which may include insulinomas that contribute to insulin dysregulation in some diabetic patients.

Diabetic foot and infection imaging

Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is one of the most frequent and serious complications of DM, contributing significantly to lower-extremity amputation risk and hospital admissions. It often arises due to a combination of peripheral neuropathy, vascular insufficiency, and impaired cellular immunity. Accurate diagnosis is critical to distinguish between soft tissue infection, osteomyelitis, and neuroarthropathy (Charcot joint).

Diabetic foot

In diabetic foot, the University of Texas Diabetic Wound Classification is routinely used to determine the stage of diabetic foot ulcers. This classification assesses and stages ulcers based on their depth and the presence of infection or ischemia.

Nuclear medicine techniques for diagnosing infection in diabetic foot include three-phase bone scintigraphy and PET/CT with 18F-FDG.[4] An illustrative example of SPECT imaging in Charcot joint is shown in Fig 1.[5]

Three-phase bone scan in a patient with diabetic foot. Clinically, (a) The vascular phase shows increased vascularisation, and (b) The soft tissue phase image demonstrates increased uptake of methylene diphosphonate in the soft tissues of the right foot, particularly in the forefoot, indicative of cellulitis. The skeletal phase image shows mild increased MDP uptake in the midfoot of the right foot, suggesting possible early Charcot neuropathy[5] MDP: Methylene diphosphonate, LT: Left; RT: Right
Fig 1:
Three-phase bone scan in a patient with diabetic foot. Clinically, (a) The vascular phase shows increased vascularisation, and (b) The soft tissue phase image demonstrates increased uptake of methylene diphosphonate in the soft tissues of the right foot, particularly in the forefoot, indicative of cellulitis. The skeletal phase image shows mild increased MDP uptake in the midfoot of the right foot, suggesting possible early Charcot neuropathy[5] MDP: Methylene diphosphonate, LT: Left; RT: Right

Bone scintigraphy

Three-phase BS (TPBS), particularly with delayed imaging at 24 h, is a highly sensitive test, although not a specific imaging modality for diabetic foot osteomyelitis.[6,7] TPBS using 99mTc-MDP is a classic nuclear medicine technique for osteomyelitis detection. It evaluates perfusion, blood pool activity, and delayed bone uptake to assess hypervascularity and increased bone metabolism.

However, studies by Larcos et al. showed that although bone scan has high sensitivity (~93%), it suffers from low specificity (~43%) due to increased uptake in fractures, Charcot joints, or sterile inflammatory conditions.[8] Similarly, Johnson et al. (1996) reported that TPBS alone cannot reliably differentiate infection from neuropathic complications.[9] An illustrative example of SPECT imaging in Charcot joint is presented in Fig 2.[10]

Dual-isotope SPECT/CT of the foot. (a) 99mTc-HDP planar: focal uptake in posterior right calcaneus (red arrow). (b) 111In-WBC planar: corresponding uptake (red arrow), consistent with infection. (c) 99mTc-SC planar: no corresponding uptake, supporting osteomyelitis. (d) 99mTc-HDP SPECT: focal uptake in posterior right calcaneus (red arrow). (e) 111In-WBC SPECT: concordant uptake (red arrow). (f) Fused SPECT/CT: localisation to posterior right calcaneus. Additional uptake in the left calcaneus and talus (green arrows in a–f) is consistent with Charcot joint without evidence of infection. DI SPECT/CT:Dual-Isotope single photon emission computed tomography /computed tomography, 9mTc-HDP: Technetium-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate, 111In-WBC = Indium-111 white blood cells, 99mTc-SC: Technetium-99m sulfur colloid
Fig 2:
Dual-isotope SPECT/CT of the foot. (a) 99mTc-HDP planar: focal uptake in posterior right calcaneus (red arrow). (b) 111In-WBC planar: corresponding uptake (red arrow), consistent with infection. (c) 99mTc-SC planar: no corresponding uptake, supporting osteomyelitis. (d) 99mTc-HDP SPECT: focal uptake in posterior right calcaneus (red arrow). (e) 111In-WBC SPECT: concordant uptake (red arrow). (f) Fused SPECT/CT: localisation to posterior right calcaneus. Additional uptake in the left calcaneus and talus (green arrows in a–f) is consistent with Charcot joint without evidence of infection. DI SPECT/CT:Dual-Isotope single photon emission computed tomography /computed tomography, 9mTc-HDP: Technetium-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate, 111In-WBC = Indium-111 white blood cells, 99mTc-SC: Technetium-99m sulfur colloid

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose

18F-FDG PET/CT is a well-established modality for detecting infections through visualisation of elevated glucose metabolism, particularly in activated neutrophils and macrophages at infection sites. It has been used effectively to diagnose peripheral nonpostoperative bone osteomyelitis and spinal infections, with active osteomyelitis showing increased 18F-FDG uptake. According to comparative studies, FDG PET/CT has demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy than three-phase 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) BS or Ga-67 citrate, particularly in chronic osteomyelitis cases.[11] A negative FDG PET/CT scan has a high negative predictive value and is especially useful for excluding chronic osteomyelitis.[11]

In the context of diabetic foot osteomyelitis, a meta-analysis by Lauri et al. reported that 18F-FDG PET/CT provides a sensitivity of approximately 89% and a specificity of 92%, highlighting its diagnostic strength. These findings suggest that FDG PET/CT is comparable to or even superior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), especially regarding specificity. In addition, the modality enables accurate assessment of the extent of infection and detection of multifocal lesions.[12]

White blood cell labeling

The initial imaging test of choice for osteomyelitis is conventional radiography. If results are negative, TPBS using 99mTc-diphosphonates combined with leukocyte imaging is the preferred radionuclide procedure for diagnosing uncomplicated osteomyelitis, Labeled leukocyte scintigraphy is widely utilized for evaluating pedal osteomyelitis in diabetic patients.

111Indium-oxine labeled white blood cell

111In-oxine labels all cell types indiscriminately, including platelets and red blood cells. Oxine forms a lipophilic complex with 111In, which passively diffuses into leukocyte membranes. Once inside, 111In separates and binds cytoplasmic components, while the oxine is excreted.[11]

White blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy remains a cornerstone in the functional imaging of infection, particularly in cases of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. The technique involves labeling autologous leukocytes with radiotracers, commonly 111Indium-oxine or 99mTechnetium-hexamethylpropylene amine oxime (99mTc-HMPAO), and re-injecting them to track their migration toward infected sites. The utility of 111In-labeled WBCs in DFI was demonstrated by Larcos et al., who reported a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 78% for the detection of osteomyelitis.[8] In a larger prospective study, Johnson et al. found that combining 111In-WBC scintigraphy with three-phase bone scanning improved sensitivity to 100%, though specificity ranged between 70% and 80%.[9] This combination proved effective even in the presence of complicating factors such as chronic ulcers or ongoing antibiotic therapy, highlighting its robustness in complex clinical scenarios. However, 111In-labeled leukocytes have low sensitivity for spinal infections, including osteomyelitis and discitis. More than half of spinal infections may appear as photopenic (cold) lesions, rather than hot spots.[11] In addition, 111In-labeled WBCs accumulate in hematopoietically active bone marrow even without infection, reducing sensitivity for chronic osteomyelitis.[13] An illustrative case of osteomyelitis in the sacroiliac joint is shown in Fig 3.[11]

(a) Posterior view of the pelvis from a bone scan shows marked increased activity (arrow) in the central region of the right sacroiliac joint. (b) Indium-111 (111In) leukocyte scan of the same patient shows relatively decreased activity (arrow) in the same region. This finding may be observed in leukocyte scans when osteomyelitis occurs in the central skeleton, particularly in the spine. WBC: White blood cell, DP: Methylene diphosphonate
Fig 3:
(a) Posterior view of the pelvis from a bone scan shows marked increased activity (arrow) in the central region of the right sacroiliac joint. (b) Indium-111 (111In) leukocyte scan of the same patient shows relatively decreased activity (arrow) in the same region. This finding may be observed in leukocyte scans when osteomyelitis occurs in the central skeleton, particularly in the spine. WBC: White blood cell, DP: Methylene diphosphonate

99mTechnetium-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime labeled white blood cell

The role of 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled WBCs in inflammation imaging offers several advantages compared to 111In-labeled leukocytes. 99mTc-HMPAO has become the preferred radiotracer for WBC labeling due to several advantages, including better image resolution, shorter imaging acquisition times, and lower radiation exposure.[11] According to the meta-analysis by Lauri et al., 99mTc-HMPAO-labeled WBC scintigraphy achieved a sensitivity of approximately 91% and a specificity of 92%, surpassing older methods and emerging as one of the most accurate nuclear techniques for diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis.[12] Its ability to distinguish active infection from sterile inflammation, such as Charcot neuroarthropathy or postsurgical changes, makes it particularly useful in diabetic patients, whose feet often exhibit overlapping structural abnormalities that may complicate interpretation with anatomic imaging alone.

Myocardial perfusion and silent ischemia

Silent coronary artery disease (CAD) is a frequent yet often underdiagnosed condition in patients with type 2 DM (T2DM), largely due to autonomic neuropathy that blunts anginal symptoms. The reported prevalence of silent CAD ranges between 2.5% and 11% in nondiabetic individuals, but increases dramatically to 12% to 57% among diabetic patients. Notably, in asymptomatic diabetic individuals, abnormal myocardial perfusion that induces ischemia has been observed in approximately 37% of case.[14]

A seminal prospective study by Mohagheghie et al. assessed 83 asymptomatic T2DM patients with ≥5 years of disease duration using 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).[15] The study revealed that 30% of patients had perfusion defects, mostly reversible, indicative of silent ischemia. In patients who underwent further coronary angiography, 48% had significant CAD. Importantly, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was an independent predictor of perfusion abnormality (odds ratio = 1.70; 95% confidence interval: 1.07–2.71; P = 0.02), suggesting that poor glycemic control may contribute to subclinical myocardial ischemia even in the absence of symptoms.[15] In addition, longer diabetes duration (>10 years) has also been associated with a higher frequency of abnormal SPECT MPI findings.[14]

In a complementary study, Nasr et al. examined the association between HbA1c levels and both myocardial perfusion and left ventricular (LV) function using gated SPECT MPI in 200 patients (132 with diabetes).[16] Although no significant relationship was found between HbA1c and Summed Stress Score, Summed Difference Score (SSS, SDS), patients with HbA1c >6.5% demonstrated significantly lower LV ejection fraction (LVEF), higher end-systolic volume, and more frequent wall motion abnormalities (all P < 0.05).[3] These findings suggest that chronic hyperglycemia may exert a greater influence on LV functional remodeling than on perfusion itself, likely through pathways involving oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and myocardial fibrosis.[16]

Collectively, these studies underscore the importance of integrating MPI into cardiovascular risk assessment protocols for asymptomatic T2DM patients, particularly those with poor glycemic control or long disease duration. The evidence supports the dual role of MPI in detecting silent ischemia and evaluating early myocardial dysfunction, thereby providing a window of opportunity for early therapeutic intervention aimed at preventing major adverse cardiac events.

Nephropathy and renal function

Nuclear medicine renal imaging offers valuable insights for early detection and monitoring of diabetic nephropathy, particularly when structural changes or biochemical abnormalities have not yet emerged. Several techniques have been evaluated:

The study by Frieske et al. demonstrated that parametric renal scintigraphy using 99mTc-EC could reveal subtle defects in renal parenchymal function and prolonged transit times, even when conventional scintigraphy and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) values remained within normal limits. The significant differences in mean transit time and clearance image patterns between diabetic patients and healthy controls support its role in early nephropathy detection before overt renal impairment occurs.[17]

Meanwhile, Klinkhammer et al. highlighted the utility of PET/MRI molecular imaging to dynamically assess SGLT2 transporter activity and tubular reabsorption. Their findings suggest that functional renal alterations in T2DM can be visualized in vivo, and these changes are reversible with therapy, making this technique especially promising for monitoring therapeutic response and guiding precision interventions in diabetic nephropathy.[18]

In contrast, Rodby et al. provided clinical validation for 99mTc-DTPA renal scintigraphy as a practical tool to estimate GFR. With a high correlation to the gold-standard iothalamate clearance method (r = 0.80), this noninvasive approach allows for serial monitoring of renal function, reducing the need for cumbersome blood or urine sampling.[19]

Taken together, these studies emphasize that renal scintigraphy is not limited to measuring GFR but can also reveal functional delays in tracer uptake and transit time, assisting in the early diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment monitoring of diabetic nephropathy.

Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is characterized by progressive occlusive atherosclerotic disease in the lower extremities. Its global prevalence ranges from 3% to 10% in the general population and increases to 15%–20% in individuals over 70 years of age. Patients with PAD have an approximately threefold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, including myocardial infarction and stroke, compared to those without PAD.[20] The risk is notably higher in patients with DM, where PAD often develops earlier and progresses more aggressively, frequently without the typical symptoms due to associated neuropathy.

Nuclear medicine imaging, including SPECT/CT and PET/CT, has emerged as an important noninvasive modality to assess both the extent and severity of PAD, offering unique insights into blood flow, tissue perfusion, and molecular markers of vascular pathology.

SPECT/CT using radiotracers such as 99mTc-tetrofosmin is widely used to visualize peripheral limb perfusion, allowing clinicians to assess the degree of ischemia and monitor responses to interventions. Meanwhile, PET imaging with 18F-FDG and 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) enables molecular characterization of atherosclerosis, including arterial inflammation and early-stage calcification, particularly in the carotid, coronary, aortic, and peripheral limb arteries.[21,22]

18F-FDG PET/CT detects arterial wall inflammation by targeting metabolically active macrophages within atherosclerotic plaques. In diabetic patients, arterial FDG uptake is significantly elevated even during early disease stages and correlates with arterial stiffness and central systolic blood pressure, indicating a state of subclinical systemic inflammation. This was demonstrated by de Boer et al. in individuals with early type 2 diabetes.[23]

Complementing this, 18F-NaF PET/CT highlights microcalcification activity, a key feature of early atherosclerotic plaque development. Chou et al. reported that NaF uptake in ischemic lower extremity muscles significantly decreased after revascularization procedures, indicating improvement in tissue perfusion and confirming its potential as a marker of therapeutic response.[24]

Stacy emphasized that both PET and SPECT imaging can stratify PAD patients into high responders or nonrespondersto revascularization, offering valuable guidance for treatment planning and outcome prediction.[22]

Importantly, preprocedural FDG uptake has been associated with higher rates of restenosis, as shown by Divakaran et al. and Chowdhury et al., suggesting that vascular inflammation identified through PET/CT may predict poor healing and long-term prognosis, particularly in high-risk diabetic populations.[25,26]

Collectively, the integration of molecular imaging with PET/CT and SPECT/CT allows for a comprehensive assessment of perfusion status, inflammatory burden, and vascular remodeling, positioning nuclear medicine as a crucial tool in the management of PAD in diabetic patients.

β-cell imaging and glucose metabolism

Increased pancreatic 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Recent advances in nuclear medicine have demonstrated that pancreatic 18F-FDG uptake is significantly elevated in patients with T2DM. Bakker et al. observed increased FDG accumulation in the head and body of the pancreas in T2DM patients compared to non-diabetic controls, despite the non-β-cell-specific nature of FDG. This finding suggests heightened metabolic activity or subclinical inflammation within pancreatic tissue, potentially reflecting early pathophysiologic changes in the islets during diabetes onset.[27]

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as a surrogate for β-cell activity

Although 18F-FDG does not directly bind to β-cell markers, it may serve as a functional surrogate for residual β-cell activity, especially in early T2DM. Uptake of FDG by metabolically active cells may indicate β-cell stress under glucotoxic conditions. Consequently, FDG PET/CT could provide indirect insight into β-cell function and disease progression, making it a potential tool for monitoring therapeutic response and staging of metabolic dysfunction.[27]

Inflammation-driven β-cell dysfunction and pancreatic fat infiltration

Horii et al. further contributed to the understanding of diabetes-related pancreatic changes by reporting that pancreatic fat infiltration is associated with islet inflammation and hyperglycemia in T2DM. Chronic low-grade inflammation within the pancreatic islets has been linked to progressive β-cell dysfunction. These structural and inflammatory changes, which can be assessed using molecular imaging, offer a mechanistic explanation for metabolic failure in T2DM beyond insulin resistance (IR) alone.[28]

VMAT2 imaging and direct quantification of β-cell mass

For more specific β-cell imaging, [18F]FP-(+)-DTBZ, a PET tracer targeting vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2), has shown promising results. Normandin et al. (2018) successfully used this tracer to quantify endogenous β-cell mass in vivo. Their findings revealed significantly lower VMAT2 binding in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared to healthy subjects, demonstrating the tracer’s ability to noninvasively assess β-cell loss. This approach holds potential for evaluating β-cell preservation in both type 1 and late-stage type 2 diabetes.[29]

Emerging tracers for β-cell mass and function imaging

A growing body of research, as reviewed by Wei et al. and Ichise and Harris, supports the development of novel β-cell-specific tracers beyond VMAT2. These include radiolabeled exendin-4, GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) ligands, and other peptide-based probes that offer high selectivity and in vivo binding to β-cells. Such tracers can simultaneously provide information on β-cell mass, receptor expression, and function, paving the way for comprehensive imaging of pancreatic islets in both diabetes and regenerative therapy research.[30,31]

Future Directions in Nuclear Medicine and Diabetes

β-cell mass and function imaging 18F-FP-DTBZ (VMAT2-targeted imaging) Imaging of pancreatic β-cell mass plays a central role in understanding the pathophysiology and progression of T1D, especially in early detection and evaluation of therapeutic interventions. The vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2) is highly expressed in β-cells and has been utilized as a molecular target for PET imaging. The radiotracer 18F-FP-(+)-DTBZ binds selectively to VMAT2, allowing in vivo quantification of β-cell mass.

Veluthakal and Harris reported that 18F-FP-DTBZ PET imaging can effectively differentiate individuals with longstanding T1D from healthy subjects, based on the marked reduction in pancreatic uptake.[32] This method enables noninvasive tracking of β-cell loss, offering potential applications in disease monitoring and evaluating islet transplantation. Furthermore, VMAT2 imaging could serve as an objective biomarker in clinical trials aimed at preserving or restoring β-cell function.[32]

Freeby et al. conducted cross-sectional and test-retest evaluations of PET with 18F-FP-(+)-DTBZ and found consistent and reproducible binding in healthy controls, with significantly lower uptake in subjects with T1D. Their findings support the utility of this tracer in quantitatively assessing β-cell mass and distinguishing pathological states.[33]

In parallel, Lin et al. performed whole-body biodistribution and dosimetric studies of 18F-FP-(+)-DTBZ and confirmed favourable kinetics and safety profiles, with pancreas-to-background ratios sufficient for diagnostic utility. However, one notable limitation is the non-specific uptake in exocrine pancreatic tissue and other organs such as the spleen and kidneys, which may reduce image contrast. In addition, interindividual variability in VMAT2 expression requires standardization of quantification protocols.[34]

Despite these challenges, 18F-FP-DTBZ PET remains a promising imaging modality for non-invasive evaluation of β-cell mass in T1D and other β-cell disorders. Ongoing advances in tracer refinement, image processing, and hybrid quantification methods are expected to improve specificity and broaden its clinical applicability.

68Ga-exendin-4 (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-targeted imaging)

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is predominantly expressed on the surface of pancreatic β-cells and represents a highly specific target for imaging functional β-cell mass. Exendin-4, a GLP-1R agonist, can be radiolabeled with gallium-68 to create PET tracers such as 68Ga-NOTA-exendin-4 and 68Ga-HBED-CC-exendin-4. These tracers have shown excellent performance in visualizing insulin-secreting tissue.

In a prospective cohort study, Luo et al. demonstrated that 68Ga-NOTA-exendin-4 PET/CT achieved a sensitivity of 97.7% and specificity of 100% in detecting localized insulinomas.[35] Beyond neuroendocrine tumors, GLP-1R imaging has been applied in T2DM. Eriksson et al. reported reduced pancreatic tracer uptake in T2DM patients, which correlated with C-peptide levels and indicated reduced β-cell function.[36]

Tracer optimization remains a subject of active investigation. A comparative study by Li et al. showed that both 68Ga-NOTA and 68Ga-HBED-CC labeled exendin-4 had similar sensitivity, although the HBED-CC variant yielded slightly better tumor-to-background ratios.[37]

However, the widespread application of GLP-1R imaging is limited by high renal uptake and low central nervous system penetration. These factors can hinder visualisation of the pancreas and necessitate mitigation strategies, such as the use of amino acid co-infusion.[38]

Despite these limitations, GLP-1R-targeted imaging holds strong potential for evaluating residual β-cell mass in T1D, assessing the success of islet transplantation, and monitoring therapies designed to preserve or regenerate β-cells. While its use in central nervous system imaging remains limited due to poor blood–brain barrier penetration-as demonstrated in the study by Deden et al. using 68Ga-NODAGA-exendin-4 PET in obese subjects, its high receptor specificity makes it well-suited for imaging pancreatic tissue.[39] With further improvements in tracer pharmacokinetics and quantification protocols, 68Ga-Exendin-4 PET may become a key tool in diabetes management and research.

Imaging inflammation and insulin resistance

Positron emission tomography tracers for imaging chronic inflammation: Translocator protein, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and somatostatin receptors

Chronic inflammation is a central component of various metabolic disorders, including metabolic syndrome, T2DM, and IR. Detecting subclinical inflammation poses a significant challenge in clinical practice due to limitations in systemic biomarkers and the invisibility of inflammation using conventional imaging techniques. The development of PET has enabled direct visualisation of inflammatory activity through molecular tracers targeting specific biomarkers. Among the most studied PET tracers for chronic inflammation are those targeting the translocator protein (TSPO), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2).

The study by Kubota (2020) provides a crucial physiological foundation, highlighting the increased uptake of tracers such as [18F] FDG and nonglucose-based tracers at sites of inflammation. In the context of chronic inflammation – such as that found in atherosclerosis or visceral obesity – macrophage activation plays a key role. TSPO, which is expressed in the mitochondria of activated macrophages, has become a principal target for imaging chronic inflammation. Tracers such as 11C-PBR28 and 18F-fluoromethyl-PBR28-d2 have demonstrated uptake patterns corresponding to macrophage presence and have been applied in various clinical and experimental settings.[40]

Ekblad et al. utilized [11C] PBR28 PET to investigate the relationship between IR, body mass index, and neuroinflammation. They found a positive correlation between HOMA-IR and TSPO uptake in several brain regions among cognitively healthy older adults. This finding suggests that subclinical inflammation, particularly within the central nervous system, may serve as an early mediator linking IR to subsequent neurological dysfunction. The study broadens the utility of TSPO PET beyond the detection of neurodegenerative inflammation to encompass inflammation associated with systemic metabolic disturbances.[41]

Another study by Oh et al. compared the TSPO tracer 18F-fluoromethyl-PBR28-d2 with 18F-FDG for imaging brown adipose tissue (BAT). Their results demonstrated that TSPO-targeted tracers can accurately visualize BAT metabolic activity, with comparable uptake levels to FDG. Considering BAT’s role in energy regulation and glucose metabolism, these findings imply that TSPO tracers may also be leveraged to assess metabolic inflammation in both brown and visceral adipose tissue.[42]

In a review by Wu et al., additional inflammatory biomarkers such as VCAM-1 and SSTR2 were highlighted. VCAM-1, an endothelial adhesion molecule involved in leukocyte recruitment, is highly expressed in active atherosclerotic plaques. Tracers targeting VCAM-1, such as [18F] VCAM-1–targeted peptides, have shown high potential for detecting vascular inflammation. Meanwhile, SSTR2, expressed on activated T lymphocytes and macrophages, has been widely used in imaging autoimmune inflammatory diseases like sarcoidosis and vasculitis using tracers such as 68Ga-DOTATATE.[43]

Collectively, these findings support the utility of non-FDG PET tracers in detecting low-grade chronic inflammation, particularly in metabolic disorders such as obesity, IR, and metabolic syndrome. The use of TSPO, VCAM-1, and SSTR2 as molecular targets extends the scope of inflammation imaging from the central nervous system to vascular and adipose tissues.

Positron emission tomography glucose uptake tracers for identifying organ-specific insulin resistance

18F-FDG is the most widely used tracer in PET imaging due to its capacity to reflect tissue glucose metabolism. While its application is well established in oncology, FDG PET also plays a crucial role in evaluating IR and tissue-specific metabolic activity, especially in the context of metabolic diseases and chronic inflammation.

IR, characterized by the impaired ability of tissues to respond to insulin signals, results in distinctive patterns of glucose uptake across various organs. The application of 18F-FDG PET/CT allows visualisation of glucose uptake distribution in tissues such as the brain, liver, skeletal muscle, and especially visceral adipose tissue, which serves as a primary site of metabolic inflammation.

Pahk et al. reported that patients with a history of acute myocardial infarction exhibited significantly higher 18F-FDG uptake in visceral adipose tissue compared to control subjects. This elevated uptake indicates metabolic and inflammatory activation in visceral fat, closely associated with the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and IR. Although FDG uptake does not directly reflect insulin levels, it provides insight into local metabolic dysregulation and inflammation, contributing to an understanding of organ-specific IR.[44]

Furthermore, Kubota et al. emphasized that increased FDG uptake in insulin-independent tissues such as activated macrophages and visceral adipose tissue can indicate inflammatory processes that exacerbate IR. In contrast, insulin-dependent tissues such as skeletal muscle and liver may exhibit reduced glucose uptake in severe IR conditions.[40]

FDG PET also yields informative insights into brain metabolism. While Ekblad et al. primarily focused on TSPO uptake, their findings correlating HOMA-IR with neuroinflammation suggest that brain glucose metabolism, as assessed by FDG PET, may also be altered in IR and linked to cognitive decline risk.[41]

Interestingly, Oh et al. demonstrated that both TSPO tracers and FDG are useful in evaluating BAT metabolic activity. BAT is insulin-sensitive and plays a key role in thermogenesis and glucose metabolism. Increased FDG uptake in BAT reflects metabolic activation potentially modulated by systemic insulin status and inflammation.[42]

Imaging of adipose tissue and metabolic activity

Imaging adipose tissue using 18F-FDG PET has provided novel insights into the metabolic roles of fat depots and the pathophysiology of IR. Cohade demonstrated that BAT activation can lead to markedly increased FDG uptake, with its distribution influenced by insulin effects and metabolic status.[45] This is critical as BAT, unlike white adipose tissue, facilitates increased glucose utilisation through adaptive thermogenesis.

Lundström et al. employed PET/MRI to assess BAT perfusion, lipid content, and glucose metabolic rate in humans, highlighting BAT’s complex metabolic response to thermogenic stimuli and its close association with insulin sensitivity.[46] Meanwhile, Maliszewska et al. showed that dietary protein sources can enhance FDG uptake in BAT, pointing to nutritional modulation as a tool for adipose metabolism intervention.[47]

Boss et al. observed that under controlled hypoglycemia, BAT metabolism increases, indicated by elevated FDG uptake, potentially reflecting a metabolic compensation mechanism to maintain glucose homeostasis.[48] In addition, Ng et al. demonstrated that regional adipose tissue depots such as visceral and subcutaneous fat play distinct roles in systemic glucose metabolism, which can be visualized using PET imaging.[49]

However, Reijrink et al. cautioned that increased FDG uptake in adipose tissue among patients with type 2 diabetes does not necessarily indicate inflammation, but may reflect metabolic activity, necessitating a broader metabolic context in image interpretation.[50]

Collectively, these studies support the use of PET, particularly 18F-FDG, to evaluate metabolically active fat depots. Future development of more specific PET tracers may allow for better differentiation between harmful visceral fat and metabolically protective fat like BAT, facilitating targeted interventions in IR and obesity-related diabetes.

Hybrid imaging and novel radiopharmaceuticals for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor and pancreatic β-cell visualisation

Recent advances have highlighted the promise of GLP-1R imaging as a key molecular target in type 2 diabetes and metabolic diseases. Brand et al. developed a novel bimodal PET/fluorescence imaging agent targeting GLP-1R, enabling simultaneous in vivo molecular and optical visualisation. This hybrid tracer is particularly valuable for translational research from preclinical models to human application.[51]

Wei et al. reviewed current strategies for β-cell molecular imaging, covering GLP-1R, VMAT2, and somatostatin receptor-based tracers. The review underscores the potential of GLP-1R-targeted imaging in detecting functional β-cell mass, although interindividual variability and limitations in binding affinity remain barriers to clinical adoption.[30]

Fernandes et al. compared PET imaging and whole-body autoradiography in assessing the biodistribution of a long-acting GLP-1 agonist. Their results confirmed the high uptake in the pancreas and kidneys, and consistent localisation in endocrine and gastrointestinal organs.[52]

These findings validate PET as a powerful modality for evaluating incretin-based drug pharmacokinetics. Overall, the integration of hybrid imaging platforms and innovative multimodal tracers such as PET/fluorescence agents targeting GLP-1R represents a transformative step toward precise diagnostics and therapy monitoring in diabetes and related metabolic disorders.

DISCUSSION

This review highlights the expanding role of nuclear medicine in diabetes, from early detection of complications to molecular-level characterization of disease processes. Compared to conventional imaging, nuclear techniques provide functional and metabolic insights, enabling earlier diagnosis and personalized management. However, limitations such as availability, cost, and tracer specificity remain challenges. Future advancements in targeted radiotracers and hybrid imaging are expected to enhance clinical applicability.

CONCLUSION

Nuclear medicine has emerged as a powerful tool in the comprehensive evaluation and management of DM, offering unique insights beyond conventional imaging. It enables precise detection of diabetic complications – ranging from infection, cardiovascular and renal involvement, to PAD – through modalities such as PET/CT, SPECT, and targeted radiotracers. In addition, advances in molecular imaging have allowed non-invasive assessment of pancreatic β-cell mass and function, IR, adipose tissue metabolism, and chronic inflammation. These innovations not only deepen our understanding of diabetes pathophysiology but also pave the way for personalized interventions and early detection strategies. Continued development of β-cell-specific and inflammation-targeted tracers, along with hybrid imaging technologies, will further enhance the clinical impact of nuclear medicine in diabetes care and research.

Author contributions:

RBA: Conceptualisation, writing – original draft; RRH: Literature review, writing – review & editing; HB: Supervision, critical revision

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The author certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The author confirms that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using the AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , . Diabetes Mellitus In: , , , , eds. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine Vol 2. (21st ed). New York: McGraw Hill; .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. . Diabetes Atlas In: , , , , eds. IDF Diabetes Atlas (9th ed). Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; .
    [Google Scholar]
  3. . Diabetes country profiles: Indonesia Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Pathophysiology and molecular imaging of diabetic foot infections. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:11552.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . 18-F flourodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging: A viable alternative to three phase bone scan in evaluating diabetic foot complications? Indian J Nucl Med. 2015;30:97-103.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Value of a 24-hour image (four-phase bone scan) in assessing osteomyelitis in patients with peripheral vascular disease. J Nucl Med. 1985;26:711-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Nuclear medicine and diabetic foot infections. Semin Nucl Med. 2009;39:52-65.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetic patients: Value of 111In-leukocyte scintigraphy. Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:527-31.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Prospective study of bone, indium-111-labeled white blood cell, and gallium-67 scanning for the evaluation of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17:10-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Evaluation of diabetic foot infection in nuclear medicine. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;61:283-91.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Essentials of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (7th ed). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; .
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Detection of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot by imaging techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing MRI, white blood cell scintigraphy, and FDG-PET. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1111-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. . Osteomyelitis: Diagnosis with In-111-labeledleukocytes. Radiology. 1989;171:141-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . Myocardial perfusion abnormalities in asymptomatic type 2 diabetic patients. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2018;30:3-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Myocardial perfusion imaging using technetium-99m sestamibi in asymptomatic diabetic patients. Nuklearmedizin. 2011;50:3-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Association between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and cardiac perfusion and function on gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2023;54:85. doi:10.1186/s43055-023-01036-7
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Parametric clearance kidney scintigrams; Diagnostic potential in diabetes. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2007;10:16-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , . Non-invasive molecular imaging of kidney diseases. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17:688-703.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Renal scanning 99mTc diethylene-triamine pentaacetic acid glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determination compared with iothalamate clearance GFR in diabetics. Am J Kidney Dis. 1992;20:569-73.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: A systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:1329-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. . Radionuclide imaging of atherothrombotic diseases. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2019;12:17.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. . Molecular imaging of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease: An emerging field in nuclear medicine. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:793975.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. Arterial stiffness is positively associated with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-assessed subclinical vascular inflammation in people with early type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1440-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , et al. Quantification of skeletal muscle perfusion in peripheral artery disease using (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography imaging. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13:e031823.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , . The potential of PET in the management of peripheral arterial disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:1018-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. Vascular positron emission tomography and restenosis in symptomatic peripheral arterial disease: A prospective clinical study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:1008-17.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , et al. Pancreatic 18F-FDG uptake is increased in type 2 diabetes patients compared to non-diabetic controls. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0213202.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , et al. Islet inflammation is associated with pancreatic fatty infiltration and hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020;8:e001508.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , et al. In vivo imaging of endogenous pancreatic ß-cell mass in healthy and type 1 diabetic subjects using 18F-fluoropropyl-dihydrotetrabenazine and PET. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:908-16.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , . Molecular imaging of ß-cells: Diabetes and beyond. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;139:16-31.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , . Imaging of beta-cell mass and function. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1001-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , . In vivo beta-cell imaging with VMAT 2 ligands-Current state-of-the-art and future perspective. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16:1568-81.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , et al. Cross-sectional and test-retest characterization of PET with [(18)F] FP-(+)-DTBZ for ß cell mass estimates in diabetes. Mol Imaging Biol. 2016;18:292-301.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , et al. Whole-body biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 18F-FP-(+)-DTBZ (18F-AV-133): A novel vesicular monoamine transporter 2 imaging agent. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1480-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor PET/CT with 68Ga-NOTA-Exendin-4 for detecting localized insulinoma: A prospective cohort study. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:715-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , , et al. Glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor imaging in individuals with type 2 diabetes. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:794-800.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , , et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-targeted PET/CT with 68 Ga-HBED-CC-Exendin-4 in localizing insulinoma: A head-to-head comparison to 68 Ga-NOTA-Exendin-4. Clin Nucl Med. 2025;50:38-43.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , et al. (68) Ga-labelled-exendin-4: New GLP1R targeting agents for imaging pancreatic ß-cell and insulinoma. Nucl Med Biol 2021:102-3. 87-96
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , , et al. Brain imaging of the GLP-1 receptor in obesity using (68) Ga-NODAGA-Exendin-4 PET. Brain Sci. 2021;11:1647.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , , , et al. Basic science of PET imaging for inflammatory diseases In: , ed. PET/CT for Inflammatory Diseases. Singapore: Springer; . p. :1-42.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , , , . Insulin resistance and body mass index are associated with TSPO PET in cognitively unimpaired elderly. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2023;43:1588-600.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , , , , et al. Brown adipose tissue imaging using the TSPO tracer [(18)F] fluoromethyl-PBR28-d(2): A comparison with [(18)F] FDG. Nucl Med Biol 2020:90-1-98-103.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , . PET imaging of inflammation biomarkers. Theranostics. 2013;3:448-66.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , , . Association of glucose uptake of visceral fat and acute myocardial infarction: A pilot (18)F-FDG PET/CT study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19:145.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. . Altered biodistribution on FDG-PET with emphasis on brown fat and insulin effect. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:283-93.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , , , et al. PET/MRI of glucose metabolic rate, lipid content and perfusion in human brown adipose tissue. Sci Rep. 2021;11:14955.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , , , , et al. Different protein sources enhance 18FDG-PET/MR uptake of brown adipocytes in male subjects. Nutrients. 2022;14:3411.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. , , , , , , et al. PET imaging during hypoglycaemia to study adipose tissue metabolism. Eur J Clin Invest. 2019;49:e13120.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , , , , et al. PET imaging reveals distinctive roles for different regional adipose tissue depots in systemic glucose metabolism in nonobese humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012;303:E1134-41.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , , , et al. [(18)F] FDG Uptake in adipose tissue is not related to inflammation in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mol Imaging Biol. 2021;23:117-26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , , et al. In vivo imaging of GLP-1R with a targeted bimodal PET/fluorescence imaging agent. Bioconjug Chem. 2014;25:1323-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , , , et al. Comparison of the tissue distribution of a long-circulating glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist determined by positron emission tomography and quantitative whole-body autoradiography. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2022;5:616-24.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections