Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Interesting image
29 (
3
); 191-192
doi:
10.4103/0972-3919.136600

Incremental value of single photon emission tomography/computed tomography in 3-phase bone scintigraphy of an accessory navicular bone

Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Madhavi Tripathi, Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029, India. E-mail: madhu_deven@yahoo.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Accessory navicular bone is one of the supernumerary ossicles in the foot. Radiography is non diagnostic in symptomatic cases. Accessory navicular has been reported as a cause of foot pain and is usually associated with flat foot. Increased radio tracer uptake on bone scan is found to be more sensitive. We report a case highlighting the significance of single photon emission tomography/computed tomography in methylene diphosphonate bone scan in the evaluation of symptomatic accessory navicular bone where three phase bone scan is equivocal.

Keywords

Accessory navicular bone
bone scan
single photon emission tomography/computed tomography
99mTc-methylene diphosphonate

A 10-year-old male child with bilateral club foot presented to the hospital with pain in his right foot. Plain X-ray did not reveal any abnormality. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed type II accessory navicular bone in right foot with synchondrosis and surrounding edema. Then patient was referred to our department for three phase bone scan. Blood flow, blood pool and delayed static images of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scan did not reveal any definite abnormal concentration of radio tracer and was equivocal. However, interestingly, hybrid single photon emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) showed a small bony structure medial to right navicular bone with sclerosis and an increased radio tracer uptake suggestive of an accessory navicular bone [Figure 1]. The CT acquisition parameters were 110/130 Kv, 100 mAs, pitch-1, 512 × 512 matrix using standard filters in a 6 slice multidetector SPECT/CT system. The CT images were reconstructed with reconstruction kernel B60s and 1 mm slice thickness in all three planes.

Three phase 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scan images. Blood flow (a), blood pool (b) and delayed static (c) images did not reveal any definite abnormal concentration of radio tracer in right foot. Single photon emission tomography (SPECT) (d), computed tomography (CT) (e) and hybrid SPECT/CT (f) images revealing a small bony structure medial to right navicular bone with sclerosis and increased MDP uptake (arrows) which was suggestive of an accessory navicular bone
Figure 1 Three phase 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scan images. Blood flow (a), blood pool (b) and delayed static (c) images did not reveal any definite abnormal concentration of radio tracer in right foot. Single photon emission tomography (SPECT) (d), computed tomography (CT) (e) and hybrid SPECT/CT (f) images revealing a small bony structure medial to right navicular bone with sclerosis and increased MDP uptake (arrows) which was suggestive of an accessory navicular bone

Accessory navicular bone (Os tibialis externum or navicular secundrium) is one of the several supernumerary ossicles of foot. Its incidence is 6-12%. It is mainly found on the medial side of the proximal navicular bone and in continuity with tibialis posterior tendon. Those patients having flat foot are more prone to develop accessory navicular bone. Three distinct types of accessory naviculars are known in the literature.[1] Type 1 accessory navicular is a sesamoid bone in posterior tibial tendon. It accounts for 30% of cases. Type 2 is an accessory ossification center in the tubercle of the navicular bone which accounts for 70% of cases. Cornuate navicular is an anomaly related to the presence of an osseous bridge connecting the navicular bone and the accessory navicular. Type 2 and cornuate navicular are mostly symptomatic and associated with clinical manifestations particularly pain. The indication of three-phase bone scan is to see if the accessory navicular bone is the cause of symptoms.[2] Radiograph is non-diagnostic except for showing its presence in symptomatic cases. The mechanism of pain in accessory navicular has been attributed to traumatic or degenerative changes at the synchondrosis or to soft-tissue inflammation when fused. In radiographic evaluation the 45° eversion oblique view of the foot is the most important view for identifying this condition.[3] High-resolution ultrasonography is also found to be useful in evaluation of accessory naviculars bone.[4] MRI findings of painful accessory navicular bone usually include persistent edema pattern in the accessory navicular bone and within the synchondrosis.[5] Surgical treatment of painful accessory navicular consists of excision along with its synchondrosis. It has been shown that all symptomatic accessory naviculars bones show positive hyperemia in the initial blood pool phase and positive tracer uptake in delayed skeletal phase.[6] If the uptake in symptomatic accessory navicular is equivalent to adjacent tarsal bones and if there is no hyperemia in the initial phase (as in our case), SPECT/CT should be performed. SPECT/CT in our study showed increased uptake corresponding to the accessory navicular bone. Although the role of 99mTc-MDP bone scan has been documented,[6] the role of SPECT/CT in accessory navicular bone has not been documented. Our case demonstrated that SPECT/CT provides an incremental value when there is an equivocal three-phase bone scan in symptomatic accessory navicular bone.

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None declared

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , , . Lower extremity scintigraphy: The foot and ankle. Semin Nucl Med. 1998;28:62-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . The accessory navicular: An important cause of medial foot pain. Clin Radiol. 1992;46:261-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . The symptomatic accessory navicular bone: A report and discussion of the clinical presentation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2005;34:47-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Clinical use of high-resolution ultrasonography for the diagnosis of type II accessory navicular bone. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:177-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . MR imaging findings of painful type II accessory navicular bone: Correlation with surgical and pathologic studies. Korean J Radiol. 2004;5:274-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Diagnostic utility and clinical significance of three phase bone scan in symptomatic accessory navicular bone. Indian J Nucl Med. 2006;21:18-22.
    [Google Scholar]

    Fulltext Views
    43

    PDF downloads
    12
    View/Download PDF
    Download Citations
    BibTeX
    RIS
    Show Sections