Translate this page into:
Incidentally Detected Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in a Patient with Carcinoma Prostate: 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Versus 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Address for correspondence: Dr. Madhavi Tripathi, Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029, India. E-mail: madhavi.dave.97@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Uptake of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in various nonprostatic tumors is well documented in the literature. We present a case of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor, incidentally detected on 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in a patient who underwent imaging for a suspected recurrence of carcinoma prostate.
Keywords
Fluorodeoxyglucose
gastrointestinal stromal tumor
positron emission tomography/computed tomography
prostate-specific membrane antigen
A 67-year-old male, postrobotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for carcinoma prostate, was referred to our department for 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in view of slowly rising prostate-specific antigen (0.024 ng/ml–0.138 ng/ml). 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed a large heterogeneous density mass with increased PSMA uptake in the left subhepatic region, adjacent to the lesser curvature of the stomach [Figure 1]. Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) showed heterogeneous enhancement of this mass. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT showed no significant FDG uptake in the mass [Figure 1]. Ultrasound (USG)-guided biopsy was performed, which was suggestive of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) [Figure 2].


GIST is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the digestive tract. It originates from the interstitial cells of Cajal and is characterized by overexpression of the tyrosine kinase receptor KIT with 95% staining positive for CD117 (c-KIT) and 70% for CD34.[1] GISTs are now considered to be potentially malignant and all nonmetastatic GISTs should be resected.[2] Small GISTs are usually asymptomatic and are usually incidentally detected either during investigations or surgical procedures for unrelated diseases.[3]
GISTs usually appear as rounded soft-tissue masses, arising from the wall of a hollow viscus (most commonly the stomach) with an endoluminal or exophytic growth pattern. It may have a central necrotic zone with peripheral enhancement on CECT. Although GISTs are usually FDG avid,[4] few cases of GISTs with low FDG uptake have been reported.[5] In these cases, FDG PET/CT cannot be used for monitoring response to therapy.[6] Few cases of GIST, incidentally detected on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging have been reported in the literature.[789] However, heterogeneity of PSMA and FDG uptake in gastric GIST have never been reported before. In such cases of GISTs which are FDG negative and PSMA positive, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT should be preferred over 18F-FDG PET/CT for response assessment.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that his name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal his identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient (s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initial s will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- Management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: From diagnosis to treatment. Swiss Med Wkly. 2004;134:145-53.
- [Google Scholar]
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach: How to manage? World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;2:271-7.
- [Google Scholar]
- 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: Useful technique for predicting malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. World J Surg. 2005;29:1429-35.
- [Google Scholar]
- CT evaluation of the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after imatinib mesylate treatment: A quantitative analysis correlated with FDG PET findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1619-28.
- [Google Scholar]
- Gastric GIST incidentally detected on 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT: Correlation between functional imaging and histology. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43:e488-91.
- [Google Scholar]
- 68Ga-PSMA uptake in an incidentally detected gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a case of suspected carcinoma prostate. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:e447-8.
- [Google Scholar]
- Incidental finding of ileal gastrointestinal stromal tumour during prostate cancer staging with prostate-specific membrane antigen scan. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021;65:89-91.
- [Google Scholar]
