Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
27 (
1
); 42-44
doi:
10.4103/0972-3919.108857

Extraosseous accumulation of bone scan tracer 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate in a phlebolith

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Venkatesh Rangarajan, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: drvrangarajan@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Uptake in non-osseous, non-urologic tissues is occasionally found in the performance of bone scintigraphy. These uptakes reflect an atypical interaction between the radiopharmaceutical and the patient. Knowledge of the rare extraskeletal uptakes and their clinical relevance helps in better interpretation of bone scans. We report an unusual occurrence of extraosseous accumulation of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate in a phlebolith in bone scan, confirmed with the aid of photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography.

Keywords

Bone scan
extraosseous uptake
phlebolith
SPECT-CT
99mTc-methylene diphosphonate

INTRODUCTION

Bone scintigraphy is an important modality for the examination of various pathological conditions of the skeletal system. Radionuclide bone imaging is quick, relatively inexpensive, widely available, and exquisitely sensitive and is invaluable in the diagnostic evaluation of numerous pathological conditions. The procedure is performed with 99mTechnetium (99mTc)-labeled diphosphonates. These compounds accumulate rapidly in bone, and by 2-6 h after injection, about 50% of the injected dose is in the skeletal system.[1] The extraosseous uptake is often an unexpected finding on the bone scan.[2] 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) imaging, customarily directed toward identifying altered skeletal metabolism, has been used extensively to image a variety of extraosseous lesions, especially heterotopic ossification[3] and metabolic, metastatic calcification.[4]

We report a rare case of accumulation of bone scintigraphy tracer in a phlebolith in a patient of adenocarcinoma of lung.

CASE REPORT

A 43-year-old female patient, known case of adenocarcinoma of right lung was referred for a 99mTc-MDP bone scan with complaint of persistent low backache since 3 months. A whole body 99mTc-MDP bone scan was performed. The scan showed abnormal, focal increased tracer uptake in left pelvic cavity, not localizing to any bone of the skeleton [Figures 1a and b, arrows]. All the bones of the axial and appendicular skeleton showed normal tracer uptake. The uptake was persistent even in post-void imaging done after adequate hydration, giving us a clue that it was not due to tracer hold up in the ureter. On single photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging, the focal tracer uptake localized to a small focus of calcification in the left pelvic cavity away from the ureter [Figure 2, arrow]. An additional ultrasonography of the pelvis confirmed that there was no ureteric calculus [Figure 3]. Review of the patient's recent contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a phlebolith in left iliac vein (CT Hounsfield unit: 338). Thus, we concluded the extraosseous 99mTc-MDP uptake was due to phlebolith in the left iliac vein.

Planar bone scan (a and b) of a 43-year-old female patient, a known case of adenocarcinoma of right lung. Focal, intense tracer uptake seen in left pelvic cavity (arrow)
Figure 1 Planar bone scan (a and b) of a 43-year-old female patient, a known case of adenocarcinoma of right lung. Focal, intense tracer uptake seen in left pelvic cavity (arrow)
Correlative single photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography fusion imaging localized this uptake to a phlebolith in left iliac vein (arrow)
Figure 2 Correlative single photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography fusion imaging localized this uptake to a phlebolith in left iliac vein (arrow)
Ultrasonography of the pelvis showing ureteric jets bilaterally (arrows), ruling out obstruction (calculus) in the ureter
Figure 3 Ultrasonography of the pelvis showing ureteric jets bilaterally (arrows), ruling out obstruction (calculus) in the ureter

DISCUSSION

Bone scintigraphy is one of the most commonly performed scintigraphic procedures. 99mTc-MDP, a bone scan tracer, has rapid blood clearance, excellent in vivo chemical stability, and a high bone-to-soft tissue ratio, which are ideal for bone imaging. Although 99mTc-MDP is customarily used to evaluate skeletal pathological conditions, its excellent clearance from normal soft tissues allows the detection of abnormal extraskeletal 99mTc-MDP accumulation.[5]

It is hypothesized that 99mTc-MDP and its analogues bind to bone by adsorption to the surface of the hydroxyapatite crystal.[6] While in soft tissue, calcium localizes through a limited number of common pathways. These pathways result in uptake of 99mTc-MDP through what is believed to be chemisorption of the radiopharmaceutical onto the surface of the calcium salts.[7]

Phleboliths are deposits which develop in the wall of a vein and are composed of calcium or lime. These are most commonly seen in the lower pelvis and sometime occur in large numbers. They are of no particular pathological significance. These are usually symptomless and are usually incidentally detected. They are often confused with ureteric stones when seen around the urinary bladder in the pelvic cavity. However, on plain radiographs, these can be distinguished from a calculus due to the presence of a translucent center and circular or oval shape.[810]

Bone scan tracer uptake in a phlebolith has been described in past.[11] Uptake in phlebolith is an example of tracer localization in dystrophic calcification. Dystrophic calcification occurs in patients with normal Ca2 + and PO4 levels and refers to Ca2 + deposition in tissues secondary to histological disruption caused by trauma, ischemia, or cellular necrosis or in the enzymatic necrosis of fat. It is thought that calcium ion binds to phospholipids present in membrane bound vesicles, phosphatases generate phosphate groups which in turn bind to the calcium, and the cycle is repeated until local concentrations are elevated and crystals begin to form. Hyaline collagen degeneration, a consequence of tissue damage, is particularly associated with Ca2 + deposition. Similar mechanism operates in other known causes of extraskeletal bone scan tracer uptake in tissue infarction, deep vein thrombosis, scars, and dermatomyositis.[12]

To conclude, we report a rare case of extraosseous uptake of bone scan tracer in a phlebolith. With growing use of integration of CT with SPECT, Nuclear Medicine physicians should become aware of such anatomical changes and variants so as to avoid misinterpretation. The awareness of the underlying pathophysiological basis of these changes and uptake of MDP in extraosseous soft tissue can significantly enhance the interpretation and diagnostic value of bone scintigraphy.

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None declared

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , , . Radionuclide bone imaging: An illustrative review. Radiographics. 2003;23:341-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Diffuse hepatic and splenic Tc-99m MDP tracer uptake in case of multiple myeloma. Indian J Nucl Med. 2010;25:70-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Serial scintigrams in the course of ectopic bone formation in paraplegic patients. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1973;118:865-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Metastatic visceral calcification identified by bone scanning. Skeletal Radiol. 1980;5:151-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Technetium-99m-methylene diphosphonate–A superior agent for skeletal imaging: Comparison with other technetium complexes. J Nucl Med. 1975;16:744-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Mechanism of uptake of bone imaging isotopes by skeletal metastases. Clin Nucl Med. 1980;5:565-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Pathophysiology and mechanisms of radiopharmaceutical localization. In: , ed. The Pathophysiologic Basis of Nuclear Medicine. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; . p. :35.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . The plain film of the abdomen. In: , , eds. Radiology Diagnosis-Imaging-Intervention. Vol 4. Philadelphia: Lippincott; . p. :5. ch 3
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Central lucency of pelvic phleboliths: Comparison of radiographs and noncontrast helical CT. Radiol. 1998;207:363-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Unenhanced helical CT criteria to differentiate distal ureteral calculi from pelvic phleboliths. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:65-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate uptake by numerous phleboliths in the lower extremity detected incidentally during bone scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med. 2010;35:289-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Nonosseous, nonurologic uptake on bone scintigraphy: Atlas and analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:242-56.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
44

PDF downloads
28
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections