Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Editorial Board
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-41-3
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Editorial Board
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-41-3
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
35 (
2
); 116-121
doi:
10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_148_19

Evaluation of CYFRA 21.1 as a Dedifferentiation Marker of Advanced Thyroid Cancer

Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Radiotherapy, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India
Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Cardiac Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Chandrashekhar Bal, Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. E-mail: csbal@hotmail.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Purpose of the Study:

Well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas have good prognosis, but as it de-differentiates, the survival rates go down. Early identification of such patients needs a marker which indicates the dedifferentiation process. CYFRA 21.1 has also shown to be increased in patients with 131I refractory thyroid cancer. We tested whether CYFRA 21.1 can differentiate between 131I avid and refractory tumors.

Methodology:

Well-differentiated thyroid cancer patients with known distant metastases were accrued and tested for stimulated and unstimulated thyroglobulin and CYFRA 21.1. All patients underwent 131I whole-body scan, 131I post therapy scan, and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography. Those with even a single 131I nonavid lesion were considered 131I refractory disease. CYFRA 21.1 of both 131I avid and nonavid was compared, and CYFRA 21.1 levels against disease extent were analyzed.

Results:

CYFRA 21.1 levels were significantly elevated in 131I refractory group. A cutoff value of 2.07 ng/ml distinguished between 131I avid and refractory disease with high sensitivity and specificity (88% and 89. 7%, respectively). However, CYFRA 21.1 levels were similar in patients when analyzed based on disease sites.

Conclusion:

CYFRA 21.1 can be utilized to differentiate between 131I avid and refractory diseases. Further long-term studies are required to use it as a predictive and prognostic marker.

Keywords

131I refractory
18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography
dedifferentiation
thyroid cancer

Introduction

Well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas have good prognosis, but as dedifferentiation sets in, the survival rates go down.[12] Response in such cases to conventional treatment modalities such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy is poor,[34] and therefore, there is a need for new effective treatment modalities. With new insights into thyroid carcinogenesis evolving, newer targeted therapeutic agents are being investigated, and some treatments such as multikinase inhibitors have shown better and promising results in such refractory cases.[5]

Early identification of such patients needs a marker which indicates dedifferentiation process. The cytokeratin 19 (CK19) is an acidic protein which is highly expressed in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), particularly in papillary carcinoma of thyroid (PTC).[67] The soluble fragments of CK19 (CYFRA 21.1) were found to be increased preoperatively in patients with locally aggressive DTC histotypes but not primary and metastatic classic DTC histotypes.[89] Thus, it promises to be a potential predictive marker for the dedifferentiation of thyroid cancer. CYFRA 21.1 has also shown to be increased in patients with 131 I refractory thyroid cancer.[10] Furthermore, 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18F-FDG PET/CT) is known to be a prognostic marker of dedifferentiated thyroid cancer (deDTC) showing increased FDG uptake in such tumors. There is no study done to compare the bulk of the disease with CYFRA 21.1 levels. No study has been done in the Indian population regarding CYFRA 21.1 in thyroid cancer. We intend to test the same.

Methodology

Patients attending the thyroid clinic of the department of nuclear medicine, with known distant metastasis from histologically proven well DTC and meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited for the study [Figure 1]. The study was approved by ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all the patients.

Flowchart depicting patient accrual and assessment
Figure 1 Flowchart depicting patient accrual and assessment

Inclusion criteria

Histologically proven DTC adult patients (>18-year-old) with known distant metastases, diagnosed either by 131I whole-body scan (WBS) done post total thyroidectomy or by biopsy in patients with metastatic presentation, were recruited for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with high antithyroglobulin (Tg) antibody, pregnant women, and those who had any previous therapies with cytotoxic chemotherapy were excluded from the study.

Levothyroxine (LT4), if given, was withdrawn 4–6 weeks before 131I therapy, to achieve TSH level of >30 mIU/mL. In addition, all patients were advised to be of any diet and drug-containing a high amount of 131I 4 weeks before therapy.

All patients underwent 131I WBS and whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT before 131I therapy. 131I WBS was acquired 24 h after the administration of 2 mCi 131I on a single-head gamma camera (Seimens E. CAM) with a medium energy collimator at the speed of 12 cm/min on each side. For 18F-FDG PET/CT, the patient was fasted for at least 4 h, and blood glucose level was measured. 10 mCi (370 MBq) of 18F-FDG was injected intravenously, and the patient was rested in a quiet room. PET/CT scan was acquired 60 min post injection with a dedicated PET/CT scanner (SIEMENS, BIOGRAPH 64). CT acquisition was performed on spiral dual slice CT with a slice thickness of 4 mm and a pitch of 1.3D PET acquisition was taken for 2–3 min per bed position. PET data were acquired using a matrix of 128 × 128 pixels with a slice thickness of 1.5 mm. CT-based attenuation correction of the emission images was employed. PET images were reconstructed by ordered subset expectation maximization iterative method (OSEM; two iterations and eight subsets).

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography image analysis

All scans were evaluated independently by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. PET images were looked for area of increased radiotracer uptake. Corresponding areas in CT images and fused PET/CT images were corroborated, and the extent of disease in the PET/CT scan was analyzed.

131I therapy

131I therapy was given according to a fixed-dose protocol, i.e., patients with lung metastasis received 150 mCi 131I (5.5 GBq) and 200 mCi (7.4GBq) with bone metastasis (with or without lung metastasis). All patients underwent 131I post therapy scan ( 131I PTS) 24–48 h after the therapy. The scan was acquired using a single-head gamma camera (Seimens E. CAM) with medium energy collimator at a speed of 20 cm/min on each side.

Image analysis

All scans were evaluated independently by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. 18F-FDG PET images were looked for area of increased radiotracer uptake. Corresponding areas in CT images and fused 18F-FDG PET/CT images were corroborated, and the extent of disease in the PET/CT scan was analyzed. 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were compared to 131I PTS. Patients were categorized as 131I refractory disease if any additional lesion was found on PET/CT scan that was not showing any 131I avidity.

Biochemical analysis

Serum Tg and CYFRA 21.1 levels were measured both before (on LT4) and 4–6 weeks after LT4 withdrawal in each patient. Serum Tg was measured by immunoradiometric assay using a commercial reagent set (DynotestTg-plus; Brahms Diagnostica, Berlin, Germany), and CYFRA 21.1 was measured by ELISA using a commercial reagent kit (TM-CYFRA 21.1 ELISA Kit, Weldon Biotech India Private Limited, Delhi, India).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) software. Normally distributed data were expressed as mean ± standard division. The normality of Tg and CYFRA 21.1 distribution was assessed using Shapiro–Wilk test. t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were applied to compare the distribution of variance in different groups. P < 0.05 is considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

A total of 61 patients were recruited for the study. Six patients did not turn up for CYFRA 21.1 and Tg analysis, 4 weeks after being put on thyroxine supplementation. One advance thyroid cancer patient in the 131I refractory group died of disease and was subsequently deleted from the study. Hence, the final analysis was done on 54 patients with 25 patients in 131I avid group ad 29 in 131I refractory group. Patients in both the groups were matching in their baseline parameters, namely age, gender, histopathology, and stage [Table 1].

Table 1 Patient demographic table
Iodine avid (n=25) Iodine refractory (n=29) P
Age (year) 44.8±13.88 51.6±14.88 0.736
Sex (females) 19 18 0.4207
HPE
 PCT 10 15 0.5432
 FCT 13 10 0.2897
 FVPCT 0 4
 Hurthle cell 1 0
Distant metastases
 Lung 7 14 0.2209
 Bone 15 1 <0.0001
 Lung and bone 3 14 0.0108

No significant difference was seen between 131I avid and 131I refractory groups with respect to patient age, gender distribution and histopathology. Age mentioned above is given in mean±SD. Bone only metastases were significantly more in 131I avid group. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. HPE: Histopathology, PCT: Papillary carcinoma of thyroid, FCT: Follicular carcinoma of thyroid, FVPCT: Follicular variant of PCT, SD: Standard deviation

18F-FDG PET/CT was done in all patients after thyroxine withdrawal to improve the sensitivity of the scan. Seven patients in 131I avid group showed lung only metastases as compared to 14 patients in 131I refractory group. Most of the cases in 131I avid group had micronodular metastases [Figure 2ac], whereas 131I refractory group had mixed micro and macronodular metastatic pattern [Figure 3ac]. Bone only metastases were seen in 15 patients in 131I avid group, whereas only one patient in 131I refractory group had bone-only metastasis. This patient had initially presented with left hip pain, which on evaluation found to have lytic lesion in the left ilium and biopsy done form the lesion showed metastatic follicular carcinoma of thyroid. Patients with both lung and bone metastases were less in 131I avid group, only three patients, whereas it was common in 131I refractory group (14 patients).

(a and b)18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography of a patient in iodine avid group showing suspicious nodule in the right lung posterior lobe with no significant fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, (c) I-131 whole-body scan done in the same patient which shows residual thyroid tissue with bilateral lung metastases. This patient's CYFRA 21.1 level was 1.49 ng/ml and had a stimulated thyroglobulin of 640 ng/ml
Figure 2 (a and b)18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography of a patient in iodine avid group showing suspicious nodule in the right lung posterior lobe with no significant fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, (c) I-131 whole-body scan done in the same patient which shows residual thyroid tissue with bilateral lung metastases. This patient's CYFRA 21.1 level was 1.49 ng/ml and had a stimulated thyroglobulin of 640 ng/ml
(a and b) Multiple fluorodeoxyglucose avid bilateral lung nodules noted in a 52-year-old female patient with papillary carcinoma of thyroid (Follicular variant) and its corresponding noncontrast computed tomography image. (c) 131I whole-body scan done in the same patient which shows no abnormal 131I concentration. Stimulated thyroglobulin of this patient was 654 ng/ml, and CYFRA 21.1 was 2.6 ng/ml
Figure 3 (a and b) Multiple fluorodeoxyglucose avid bilateral lung nodules noted in a 52-year-old female patient with papillary carcinoma of thyroid (Follicular variant) and its corresponding noncontrast computed tomography image. (c) 131I whole-body scan done in the same patient which shows no abnormal 131I concentration. Stimulated thyroglobulin of this patient was 654 ng/ml, and CYFRA 21.1 was 2.6 ng/ml

The Tg levels, both on and off thyroxine, did not differ in 131I avid and 131I refractory group. Off-thyroxine Tg levels were significantly elevated in both the groups. Serum CYFRA 21.1 was not affected by T4 therapy but was significantly higher in patients with 131I refractory disease compared with patients with 131I avid disease [P < 0. 0001; Table 2]. One of the patients in 131I refractory group had an abnormally high CYFRA 21.1 level (49.2 ng/ml) but was later confirmed to have carcinoma lung. Comparing CYFRA 21.1 values between the groups, even after the exclusion of this patient, showed a significant difference.

Table 2 Comparison of thyroglobulin and cytokeratin fragment 21.1 between 131I avid and refractory groups
Tumor markers 131I avid 131I refractory P
Tg (off T4) 709.5 (5-4145) 640 (82-3420) 0.2491
Tg (on T4) 137 (0.9-3450) 94 (9-1324) 0.1921
CYFRA 21.1 (off T4) 1.28 (0.75-3.3) 2.6 (0.9-49) <0.0001
CYFRA 21.1 (on T4) 1.47 (0.99-2.42) 2.7 (0.88-49.2) <0.0001
CYFRA 21.1 (on T4)* 1.47 (0.99-2.42) 2.65 (0.88-4.9)* <0.0001

On comparison between 131I avid and 131I refractory groups, no difference was seen in serum Tg levels, but a significant difference was seen in CYFRA 21.1 levels. *CYFRA 21.1 after exclusion of a patient with secondary lung malignancy having abnormally high CYFRA 21.1 levels. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Tg: Thyroglobulin, T4: Thyroxine, CYFRA 21.1: Cytokeratin fragment 21.1

CYFRA 21.1 values were compared between the patients off each group and analyzed. Interestingly, CYFRA 21.1 values did not differ with the bulk of disease or with the site of the disease, i.e., patients having lung only or bone-only metastases, or both lung and bone metastases showed similar CYFRA 21.1 values. Results were similar in both the groups [Tables 3 and 4].

Table 3 Comparison of cytokeratin fragment 21.1 with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based disease extent in 131I avid group
Lungs (n=7) Bone (n=15) P
CYFRA 21.1 (on T4) 1.43 (0.81-3.3) 1.24 (0.75-2.04) 0.1586
Lungs (n=7) Lungs and bone (n=3) P
CYFRA 21.1 (on T4) 1.43 (0.81-3.3) 1.69 (1-2.2) 0.8333
Bone (n=15) Lungs and bone (n=3) P
CYFRA 21.1 (on T4) 1.24 (0.75-2.04) 1.69 (1-2.2) 0.2863

On comparison with extent of disease on 18F-FDG PET/CT, no significant difference was noted with the extent of disease and cytokeratin fragment 21.1 levels in 131I avid group. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. T4: Thyroxine, CYFRA 21.1: Cytokeratin fragments 21.1, 18F-FDG PET/CT:18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Table 4 Comparison of cytokeratin fragments 21.1 with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based disease extent in 131I refractory group
Lungs (n=14) Lungs and bone (n=14) P
CYFRA 21.1 (on T4) 2.5 (0.9-4.6) 2.95 (1.48-49) 0.2505

On comparison of CYFRA 21.1 with the extent of disease on 18F-FDG PET/CT, no significant difference was noted in the 131I refractory group. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. T4: Thyroxine, CYFRA 21.1: Cytokeratin fragments 21.1, 18F-FDG PET/CT: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography

CYFRA 21.1 values of 131I avid and 131I refractory group were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve [Figure 4]. A cutoff value of 2.07 ng/ml distinguished between 131I avid and refractory disease with high sensitivity and specificity (88% and 89. 7%, respectively).

Receiver operating characteristic analysis showing a cutoff value of (2.07 ng/ml) to differentiate between iodine avid and refractory diseases with high sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 89.7%, respectively
Figure 4 Receiver operating characteristic analysis showing a cutoff value of (2.07 ng/ml) to differentiate between iodine avid and refractory diseases with high sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 89.7%, respectively

Discussion

The management of deDTC is a therapeutic challenge. The 131I refractory and 18F-FDG PET/CT positive thyroid cancer have a poor prognosis in contrast to the well DTC.[21112] Conventional treatment is of marginal benefit for advanced thyroid cancers, emphasizing the importance of developing novel effective therapies. The role of tumor markers, which can predict such aggressive tumors, is thus important to direct the line of management, which can lead to better outcomes.

Higher CYFRA 21.1 levels were found in patients with primary aggressive DTC but not in conventional DTC histotypes.[8913] Such differences suggest that 131I refractory thyroid cancer cells are likely the source of increased serum CYFRA 21.1. Previous studies in human lung and liver cancer cell lines showed that among CK19-producing cells, only those with caspase-3 (an enzyme involved in apoptosis phenomena) expression induced high CYFRA 21.1 levels in culture supernatants.[141516] Serum caspase-3 enzyme activity is detectable in patients with metastatic 131I refractory thyroid cancer.[8] The same is reflected in our studies where significantly higher levels of CYFRA 21.1 are noted in 131I refractory disease as compared to well-differentiated metastatic thyroid cancer [P < 0.0001, Table 2]. Aggressive thyroid tumors, i.e., tumors with high proliferation rate, which have increased rate of apoptosis and subsequent necrosis, are more likely to release CYFRA 21.1 into the serum. This is reflected in a study done by Gao et al. and Giovanella et al., in which negative tissue CK19 staining of aggressive thyroid tumors showed high levels of CK19-soluble fragments in serum due to the fast processing of CK19 molecules in such tumors.[910] Interesting fact in this study is that even though only those patients with primary well-differentiated tumor histotypes were recruited, patients with 131I refractory metastatic disease showed increased CYFRA 21.1 levels. This is in concordance to the fact that genetically, the metastatic disease tends to have more chromosomal abnormalities than the primary, the dedifferentiation leading to increased serum CYFRA 21.1 level. One of the patients from the 131I refractory group was found out to have second primary carcinoma in the lung; thus, it had a very high CYFRA 21.1 level. Analysis is done after excluding the patient also showed significant difference (P = 0. 001) between CYFRA 21.1 levels of 131I refractory and 131I avid groups. On doing ROC analysis, a cutoff value of 2.07 ng/ml differentiated between 131I avid and refractory diseases with high sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 89.7%, respectively.

Patients with increased CYFRA 21.1 levels had variable Tg levels. Tg levels were not significantly different between I–131 refractory and 131I avid groups [Table 2]. One possible reason could be due to the selection criteria as the disease was termed 131I refractory even if one of the lesions or an additional lesion found on 18F-FDG PET/CT was not 131I avid. Second, all the patients had well-differentiated tumors to start with, thus having differentiating properties such as Tg production and Sodium iodide symporter (NIS) expression. The genetic aberrations leading to decreased NIS expression and nonthyroglobulin secreting metastatic tumors though overlapping evolve differently as seen in thyroglobulin-elevated negative iodine scintigraphy syndrome, thus giving a different phenotypic presentation with some tumors retaining either of the differentiating properties.

In our study, PTCs with lung metastases were far more common in 131I refractory than the 131I avid group. PTCs with different mutations have distinct histopathologic appearance and biologic properties.[17] Tumors associated with RET/PTC1 rearrangements are of conventional type with indolent coarse, whereas those with B-Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma (B-Raf), Rat Sarcoma virus (RAS), and Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) mutations are associated with aggressive variants, decreased 131I avidity, distant metastases, and high recurrence rates.[18] BRAF mutations are commonly seen in PTC, particularly in the solid variants, and maybe one of the reasons for having increased number of PCTs with lung metastases in 131I refractory group.

It is now a well-known fact that 18F-FDG PET/CT has the ability to locate residual or metastatic lesions in patients suspected of recurrence, with loss of ability to concentrate 131I in situations of high Tg levels or rising anti-Tg antibodies titers.[192021] In our study, 18F-FDG PET/CT was done to know the extent of disease. Lesions were called as metastatic based on the uptake and by their CT characteristics when uptake was minimal, as noted in well DTCs. Hence, all lesions, irrespective of uptake, were taken into account as all the patients were diagnosed cases of distant metastases, i.e., with lung and skeletal metastases. The FDG uptake seen in 131I-negative lesions could indicate the growth of more aggressive tumor cells in metastatic sites that have lost the activity of the NIS but that have increased expression of the glucose transporter 1 gene.[22] However, analyses of CYFRA 21.1 in relation to the site of metastases did not reveal any significant difference [Tables 3 and 4]. Patients with bone-only or lung only metastases had similar CYFRA 21.1 values as compared to those who had both lung and bone metastases. This might probably indicate that CYFRA 21.1 levels are not related to the bulk of disease, but nature of the tumor per se, i.e., if all the sites are well-differentiated and 131I avid, no matter the number of lesions CYFRA 21.1 values will be low. Whether such an indication can make CYFRA 21.1 a better prognostic marker, needs to be evaluated. Quantitative analyses with standardized uptake value were not done due to the low avidity of FDG in well DTC, and presence of both iodine avid and iodine refractory lesions in 131I refractory group. Lesion-wise analyses were not done in this study due to difference in lesion wise distribution in both the groups (only one patient in 131I refractory group had solitary bone metastases, and almost all patients had mixed macro and micronodular pulmonary metastases in 131I refractory group). Comparison with exact number of lesions in a larger number of patients might provide conclusive evidence in future.

Serum Tg (Tg) is the best biomarker so far for postoperative follow-up of DTC, but it is not perfect for the following reasons: In many cases, persistent Tg cannot tell thyroid tissue remnant from residual or recurrent tumor; antithyroglobulin autoantibody present in many DTC patients can interfere with serum Tg measurement in immunometric assays, causing inappropriately low Tg values and lastly non stimulated Tg might be falsely low which is used in follow-up. Thus, there is a need for a novel tumor marker which overcomes the limitations of Tg and can predict poor prognosis, particularly in those who are on redifferentiation therapy, in whom Tg levels are erratic.

Conclusion

Serum CYFRA 21.1 levels are significantly increased in 131I refractory deDTC. The cutoff serum value of 2.07 ng/ml differentiates between well-differentiated and dedifferentiated metastatic thyroid cancer with high specificity and sensitivity. However, there is a need for larger prospective randomized control trial to know the prognostic implications of higher CYFRA 21.1 levels and its role in those undergoing redifferentiation therapies. Can pretherapeutic absolute level of CYFRA 21.1 or its dynamicity predict the dedifferentiation process, needs to be evaluated.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , . New therapeutic approaches for metastatic thyroid carcinoma. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:148-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Approach to the patient with advanced differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166:5-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . A randomized trial of doxorubicin versus doxorubicin plus cisplatin in patients with advanced thyroid carcinoma. Cancer. 1985;56:2155-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Cytotoxic chemotherapy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010;22:464-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Phase II trial of sorafenib in metastatic thyroid cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1675-84.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Cytokeratin expression of benign and malignant epithelial thyroid gland tumors. An immunohistologic study of 154 neoplasms using 8 different monoclonal cytokeratin antibodies. Pathologe. 1996;17:425-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . CYFRA 21-1 as a tumor marker used in measuring the serum fragment of cytokeratin subunit 19 by immunoradiometric assay. Ann Nucl Med. 1994;8:301-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Circulating cytokeratin 19 fragments in patients with benign nodules and carcinomas of the thyroid gland. Int J Biol Markers. 2008;23:54-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Tumor markers in thyroid carcinoma with pulmonary metastases after thyroidectomy. Lab Med. 2009;40:30-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Serum cytokeratin 19 fragments: A dedifferentiation marker in advanced thyroid cancer. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;167:793-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Long-term outcome of 444 patients with distant metastases from papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma: Benefits and limits of radioiodine therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:2892-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . Survival and death causes in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:313-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . The role of caspase 3 in producing cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) in human lung cancer cell lines. Int J Cancer. 2001;91:468-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . Caspase-mediated p65 cleavage promotes TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2005;65:6111-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . CYFRA 21-1 is released in TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis in the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HuH-7. Int J Oncol. 2002;21:441-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Biomarkers as predictors of response to treatment with motesanib in patients with progressive advanced thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:5018-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . Molecular classification of papillary thyroid carcinoma: Distinct BRAF, RAS, and RET/PTC mutation-specific gene expression profiles discovered by DNA microarray analysis. Oncogene. 2005;24:6646-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , . BRAF mutation predicts a poorer clinical prognosis for papillary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:6373-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , . [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography localizes residual thyroid cancer in patients with negative diagnostic (131) I whole body scans and elevated serum thyroglobulin levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:2291-302.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Impact of FDG PET on patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who present with elevated thyroglobulin and negative 131I scan. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:71-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the follow-up of papillary or follicular thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3779-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in thyroid cancer: Results of a multicentre study. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:1547-52.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections