Translate this page into:
Erratum: Role of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of recurrence in patients with cervical cancer
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
In the article titled, “Role of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of recurrence in patients with cervical cancer” published in pages 216-220, issue 4, vol. 28 of Indian Journal Nuclear Medicine,[1] the second sentence in the second paragraph under the Results section is written incorrectly as “Of these, four were false positive and 37 were true negative” instead of “Of these, four were false positive and 37 were true positive”.
REFERENCE
- Role of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of recurrence in patients with cervical cancer. Indian J Nucl Med. 2013;28:216-20.
- [Google Scholar]