Translate this page into:
Cutaneous Lesions in a Case of Recurrent Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa on FDG/PET
*Corresponding author: Dr. Ameya D Puranik, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr E Borges Marg, Mumbai, 400012, Maharashtra, India. ameya2812@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Yadav M, Rangarajan V, Puranik AD. Cutaneous Lesions in a Case of Recurrent Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa on FDG/PET. Indian J Nucl Med. 2026;41:269-70. doi: 10.25259/IJNM_73_2026
47-year-old male, a known case of carcinoma of the left buccal mucosa, underwent composite resection and free flap reconstruction followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. A few years later, developed subglottic carcinoma and received low-dose immunotherapy and Erlotinib, Methotrexate and Celecoxib. 2-4 weeks later, the patient started developing an extensive cutaneous Grade 3 maculopapular rash followed by lichenoid pustular eruptions all over the trunk and extremities (D). 6 weeks later, the patient presented in casualty with Grade 4 neutropenia, Grade 3 anaemia, Grade 1 thrombocytopenia, Grade 1 dyspnoea and hypotension, which was managed intensively. He underwent an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for assessment of disease status. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) (A) and fused sagittal PET/CT images (B) show extensive skin and subcutaneous nodular lesions, which can be seen on axial fused PET and PET/CT (C) images and also on clinical examination (D).

Ethical approval:
Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understand that the patient’s names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.