Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Interesting Image
35 (
3
); 267-268
doi:
10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_23_20

Complete Pathological Response Noted in Explanted Liver After Y90-SIR-Spheres Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Department of Nuclear Medicine, MIOT International, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Pathology, MIOT International, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Piyush Chandra, Department of Nuclear Medicine, MIOT International, Manapakkam, Chennai - 600 056, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail: drpiyushchandrak@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

In the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, achieving complete pathological response (CPR) in explanted liver specimens following any locoregional treatments is associated with reduced recurrence rates and better posttransplant survival compared to the incomplete response. Here, we present the imaging findings of a patient who achieved CPR in the explanted liver following Y-90 SIR-Spheres® therapy.

Keywords

Carcinoma
complete
explant
hepatocellular
liver
response
SIR-Spheres®
Y90

A 62-year-old male with a history of chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh score A) with 4.1 cm arterially enhancing lesion in the segment VI/VII of the liver [Figure 1a and b, bold black arrows] suggestive of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was referred for selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using Y-90 SIR-Spheres® as a bridge to liver transplantation. Pre-SIRT planning angiography showed normal celiac axis anatomy and 4% hepatopulmonary shunt and tumor-to-normal liver uptake ratio (TNR) of 6 on Tc-99m macroaggregated (MAA) scintigraphy [Figure 1c and d, thin black arrows]. The therapeutic dose administered calculated using partition model, delivering a liver limiting dose (50 Gy), was 1.7 GBq, with an estimated tumor adsorbed dose (TAD) of about 350 Gy. After 10 days of angiography, SIRT was executed by administering Y90 SIR-spheres through selective cannulation of the distal right hepatic artery. Posttherapy, Y90 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) showed selective concentration of Y-90 SIR-Spheres® in the tumor bed with high TNR [Figure 1e and f, white arrows], concordant with the MAA scan. The patient subsequently underwent successful deceased donor liver transplantation 1-month post-SIRT. Explant liver pathology study revealed no evidence of any viable tumor cells (absence of any mitotic activity) and extensive necrosis in the irradiated liver bed [Figure 2a and b, black arrows]. The patient continued to be asymptomatic and disease-free at 9 months follow-up (at the time of writing this report).

(a and b) Solitary arterially enhancing lesion in the right lobe involving segments VI/VII (bold black arrows). (c and d) Anterioposterior Tc-99m macroaggregated scinitigraphy showing focal increased perfusion in the right lobe (thin black arrows) with good tumor-to-normal liver uptake ratio and the absence of any significant hepatopulmonary shunting. (e and f) Post-therapy Y-90 SIR-Spheres positron emission tomography – computed tomography images showing selective intense uptake of the radio-pharmaceutical into the tumor bed (white arrows) polymerase chain reaction assay
Figure 1 (a and b) Solitary arterially enhancing lesion in the right lobe involving segments VI/VII (bold black arrows). (c and d) Anterioposterior Tc-99m macroaggregated scinitigraphy showing focal increased perfusion in the right lobe (thin black arrows) with good tumor-to-normal liver uptake ratio and the absence of any significant hepatopulmonary shunting. (e and f) Post-therapy Y-90 SIR-Spheres positron emission tomography – computed tomography images showing selective intense uptake of the radio-pharmaceutical into the tumor bed (white arrows) polymerase chain reaction assay
(a) Gross cut specimen of the explanted liver showing parenchymal necrosis in the tumor bed (thin black arrow) with background liver showing the cirrhotic change. (b) Tumor bed with in situ microspheres (bold black arrow) extensive tumor necrosis and no mitotic activity-suggestive of complete pathological response (H and E, ×400)
Figure 2 (a) Gross cut specimen of the explanted liver showing parenchymal necrosis in the tumor bed (thin black arrow) with background liver showing the cirrhotic change. (b) Tumor bed with in situ microspheres (bold black arrow) extensive tumor necrosis and no mitotic activity-suggestive of complete pathological response (H and E, ×400)

Of all the locoregional therapies (LRT) available as a bridge therapy for liver transplantation, SIRT using Y90 has been reported to have a maximum incidence of complete pathological response (CPR) in the explanted liver with least liver toxicities.[1] Studies have shown that pathological downstaging of primary tumor or achieving CPR in explant liver pathology with LRT for HCC is a strong predictor of recurrence-free survival.[234] Response to Y-90 SIR-Spheres® is a function of TAD, which critically depends on the method of therapeutic dose estimation used. The partition model should be preferred for over body surface/empirical methods for estimating the optimal Y90 therapeutic dose whenever feasible.[5] As per Chansanti et al., reported cutoff values for TAD (based on 99mTc-MAA single-photon emission CT/CT) was >190 Gy for responders (93% specificity) and that for nonresponders about <72 Gy (100% specificity).[6] For achieving the best long-term outcomes for bridge therapy for liver transplantation, proper patient selection and maximizing the TAD aiming for complete imaging/pathological response are imperative.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , , , , . Comparison of outcomes between SBRT, yttrium-90 radioembolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and radiofrequency ablation as bridge to transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2016;1:35-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Locoregional therapy-induced tumor necrosis as a predictor of recurrence after liver transplant in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3632-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Significance of tumor necrosis for outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving locoregional therapy prior to liver transplantation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2638-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Complete pathologic response to pretransplant locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma defines cancer cure after liver transplantation: Analysis of 501 consecutively treated patients. Ann Surg. 2015;262:536-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Clinical implications of the body surface area method versus partition model dosimetry for yttrium-90 radioembolization using resin microspheres: A technical review. Ann Nucl Med. 2011;25:455-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Tumor dose response in yttrium-90 resin microsphere embolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases: A tumor-specific analysis with dose estimation using SPECT-CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28:1528-35.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections