Translate this page into:
Complete Pathological Response Noted in Explanted Liver After Y90-SIR-Spheres Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Address for correspondence: Dr. Piyush Chandra, Department of Nuclear Medicine, MIOT International, Manapakkam, Chennai - 600 056, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail: drpiyushchandrak@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
In the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, achieving complete pathological response (CPR) in explanted liver specimens following any locoregional treatments is associated with reduced recurrence rates and better posttransplant survival compared to the incomplete response. Here, we present the imaging findings of a patient who achieved CPR in the explanted liver following Y-90 SIR-Spheres® therapy.
Keywords
Carcinoma
complete
explant
hepatocellular
liver
response
SIR-Spheres®
Y90
A 62-year-old male with a history of chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh score A) with 4.1 cm arterially enhancing lesion in the segment VI/VII of the liver [Figure 1a and b, bold black arrows] suggestive of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was referred for selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using Y-90 SIR-Spheres® as a bridge to liver transplantation. Pre-SIRT planning angiography showed normal celiac axis anatomy and 4% hepatopulmonary shunt and tumor-to-normal liver uptake ratio (TNR) of 6 on Tc-99m macroaggregated (MAA) scintigraphy [Figure 1c and d, thin black arrows]. The therapeutic dose administered calculated using partition model, delivering a liver limiting dose (50 Gy), was 1.7 GBq, with an estimated tumor adsorbed dose (TAD) of about 350 Gy. After 10 days of angiography, SIRT was executed by administering Y90 SIR-spheres through selective cannulation of the distal right hepatic artery. Posttherapy, Y90 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) showed selective concentration of Y-90 SIR-Spheres® in the tumor bed with high TNR [Figure 1e and f, white arrows], concordant with the MAA scan. The patient subsequently underwent successful deceased donor liver transplantation 1-month post-SIRT. Explant liver pathology study revealed no evidence of any viable tumor cells (absence of any mitotic activity) and extensive necrosis in the irradiated liver bed [Figure 2a and b, black arrows]. The patient continued to be asymptomatic and disease-free at 9 months follow-up (at the time of writing this report).


Of all the locoregional therapies (LRT) available as a bridge therapy for liver transplantation, SIRT using Y90 has been reported to have a maximum incidence of complete pathological response (CPR) in the explanted liver with least liver toxicities.[1] Studies have shown that pathological downstaging of primary tumor or achieving CPR in explant liver pathology with LRT for HCC is a strong predictor of recurrence-free survival.[234] Response to Y-90 SIR-Spheres® is a function of TAD, which critically depends on the method of therapeutic dose estimation used. The partition model should be preferred for over body surface/empirical methods for estimating the optimal Y90 therapeutic dose whenever feasible.[5] As per Chansanti et al., reported cutoff values for TAD (based on 99mTc-MAA single-photon emission CT/CT) was >190 Gy for responders (93% specificity) and that for nonresponders about <72 Gy (100% specificity).[6] For achieving the best long-term outcomes for bridge therapy for liver transplantation, proper patient selection and maximizing the TAD aiming for complete imaging/pathological response are imperative.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- Comparison of outcomes between SBRT, yttrium-90 radioembolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and radiofrequency ablation as bridge to transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2016;1:35-42.
- [Google Scholar]
- Locoregional therapy-induced tumor necrosis as a predictor of recurrence after liver transplant in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3632-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Significance of tumor necrosis for outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving locoregional therapy prior to liver transplantation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2638-46.
- [Google Scholar]
- Complete pathologic response to pretransplant locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma defines cancer cure after liver transplantation: Analysis of 501 consecutively treated patients. Ann Surg. 2015;262:536-45.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clinical implications of the body surface area method versus partition model dosimetry for yttrium-90 radioembolization using resin microspheres: A technical review. Ann Nucl Med. 2011;25:455-61.
- [Google Scholar]
- Tumor dose response in yttrium-90 resin microsphere embolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases: A tumor-specific analysis with dose estimation using SPECT-CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28:1528-35.
- [Google Scholar]
