Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
21 (
2
); 36-40

Comparison of Nitrate Augmented 99mTc-Sestamibi Infusion with Nitrate Augmented 99mTc-Sestamibi Bolus Injection for the Detection of Myocardial Viability

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, Bangalore, India
Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Aim:

It has been stated that nitrate augmented 99mTc-Sestamibi bolus injection is almost comparable to 24-hour reinjection of Tl-201 for the detection of myocardial viability. This study was aimed to see if nitrateaugmented infusion injection of 99mTc-Sestamibi can reveal more areas of viable myocardium as compared to the standard stress rest protocol of 99mTc-Sestamibi and nitrate-augmentation.

Materials & Methods:

25 patients (all men) with a mean age of 42.72 yrs (age ranging from 28-57 yrs) with a recent history of myocardial infarction (3 weeks to 6 months) were included in the study. A routine stress — rest myocardial perfusion scan with 99mTc-Sestamibi was performed on these subjects. The rest study was augmented with 10 mg of nitroglycerin sublingually. These subjects were given the same dose of nitroglycerin and 99mTc-Sestamibi two days later. 99mTc-Sestamibi was given as an infusion over a period of 45 minutes and images were obtained after one hour. 17 segment myocardial model was taken for analysis and a total of 425 segments were analyzed out of which 176 segments were for viability evaluation. Results: In resting images obtained with MIBI bolus injection, there was improvement in 17 segments (9.6%) when compared to the post stress images and in images obtained after infusion, there was improvement in 34 assessed for viability segments (19.3%). In the remaining segments, there was improvement in 48 segments (19.27%) in the images obtained with MIBI bolus injection and improvement in 85 segments (34.13%) in the images obtained with MIBI infusion.

Conclusion:

This study shows that nitrate augmented MIBI infusion is helpful in detecting more areas of viable myocardium when compared to the standard resting study following bolus injection.

Keywords

Myocardial viability
nitrate augmented
99mTc-Sestamibi.

Fulltext Views
32

PDF downloads
25
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections