Translate this page into:
Brown fat FDG Uptake - A Common Finding in FDG PET CT Scan and the Relation to Demographic, Environmental, and Clinical Factors
Address for correspondence: Dr. Anurag Jain, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Command Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. E-mail: triplea.jain@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Introduction:
Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is crucial for thermogenesis and energy expenditure. This study examines the demographic, environmental, and clinical factors influencing brown fat fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake, particularly in relation to its anatomical distribution, body mass index (BMI), gender, and temperature.
Methods:
Data from 139 participants were analyzed, documenting demographics, BMI, weight, and environmental temperatures. FDG uptake by BAT at various anatomical sites was assessed using positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and Mann–Whitney U-tests, were conducted to explore the associations between BAT uptake and the variables of interest.
Results:
Lower external temperatures were associated with increased BAT uptake at perivascular, periviscus, and solid organ sites. Meanwhile, higher ambient room temperatures were linked with increased uptake at these same sites, possibly due to contrast with the cold external environment during winter.
Conclusion:
Our findings highlight the significant influence of gender and environmental temperatures on BAT uptake. The thermogenic role of BAT in colder conditions underscores its metabolic significance. Further research is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms of these associations and their potential implications for metabolic health interventions.
Keywords
Brown fat fluorodeoxyglucose uptake
clinical factors
demographic
environmental
fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography scan
Introduction
Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is known for its capacity to generate heat through nonshivering thermogenesis, a process that is particularly active in colder environments. Current research was carried out in India, that is having a tropical climate, and our study has highlighted the metabolic significance of BAT in adults, linking its activity to overall energy expenditure and metabolic health. This study aims to investigate the demographic, clinical, and environmental factors affecting BAT uptake in a diverse cohort of adults.
Methods
We analyzed data from 139 participants, documenting demographic characteristics, body mass index (BMI), weight, and environmental temperatures. BAT uptake was assessed at various anatomical sites using imaging techniques. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine the associations between BAT uptake and the variables of interest, employing Chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and Mann–Whitney U-tests where appropriate.
Results
Demographic and clinical characteristics
The study included 139 participants with a mean age of 37.87 ± 15.67 years. Males comprised 41.73% of the cohort. The primary indications for scans varied, with the most common being pelvic malignancies (20.86%) and lymphoproliferative disorders (18.71%). The mean BMI of participants was 19.59 ± 4.52 kg/m² [Table 1].
| Demographic and clinical characteristics | Total study participants (n=139), n (%) |
|---|---|
| Age (years), mean±SD | 37.87±15.67 |
| Male | 58 (41.73) |
| Indication of scan | |
| Pelvic | 29 (20.86) |
| Breast | 22 (15.83) |
| Gastrointestinal malignancy | 10 (7.19) |
| Head and neck | 25 (17.99) |
| Lung | 10 (7.19) |
| Lymphproliferative disorder | 26 (18.71) |
| Hematological | 6 (4.32) |
| Inflammatory | 8 (5.76) |
| Infectious | 2 (1.44) |
| NETs | 1 (0.72) |
| Last document weight (kg), mean±SD | 52.78±12.92 |
| Present weight (kg), mean±SD | 52.57±12.87 |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean±SD | 19.59±4.52 |
| Ambient room temperature of the day, mean±SD | 20.07±0.93 |
BMI: Body mass index, SD: Standard deviation, NETs: Neuro Endocrine Tumors
Brown fat uptake sites
The most common sites of BAT uptake were between the anterior neck muscles and the supraclavicular fossa (99.28%), under the clavicles (66.19%), and in the axilla (44.60%). Less frequent sites included the anterior abdominal wall (1.44%) and around solid organs (13.67%) [Table 2].
| Site of subcutaneous brown fat intake | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Between the anterior neck muscles and supraclavicular fossa | 138 (99.28) |
| Under the clavicles | 92 (66.19) |
| In the axilla | 62 (44.60) |
| Anterior abdominal wall | 2 (1.44) |
| Inguinal fossa | - |
| Perivascular | 17 (12.23) |
| Periviscus | 9 (6.47) |
| Around solid organs | 19 (13.67) |
Associations with body mass index
No significant association was found between BMI and BAT uptake at most sites, except around solid organs, where individuals with a normal BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m²) showed higher BAT uptake (P = 0.03) [Table 3].
| Site of subcutaneous brown fat intake | BMI categories (kg/m2) | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Below 18.5, n (%) | 18.5–24.9, n (%) | ≥25, n (%) | ||
| Between the anterior neck muscles and supraclavicular fossa | 46 (40.00) | 50 (43.48) | 19 (16.52) | 0.57 |
| Under the clavicles | 26 (34.67) | 34 (45.33) | 15 (20.00) | 0.18 |
| In the axilla | 17 (36.17) | 23 (48.94) | 7 (14.89) | 0.58 |
| Anterior abdominal wall | - | - | - | - |
| Inguinal fossa | - | - | - | - |
| Perivascular | 2 (14.29) | 8 (57.14) | 4 (28.57) | 0.06 |
| Periviscus | 2 (25.00) | 5 (62.50) | 1 (12.50) | 0.70 |
| Around solid organs | 2 (11.76) | 12 (70.59) | 3 (17.65) | 0.03 |
BMI: Body mass index
Gender differences
A significant gender difference was observed in BAT uptake under the clavicles, with females showing higher uptake (65.22%) compared to males (34.78%) (P = 0.02) [Table 4].
| Sites of brown fat uptake | Female | Male | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Between the anterior neck muscles and supraclavicular fossa | 81 (58.70) | 57 (41.30) | 0.24 |
| Under the clavicles | 60 (65.22) | 32 (34.78) | 0.02 |
| In the axilla | 38 (61.29) | 24 (38.71) | 0.52 |
| Anterior abdominal wall | - | 2 (100) | 0.09* |
| Inguinal fossa | - | - | - |
| Perivascular | 9 (52.94) | 8 (47.06) | 0.63 |
| Periviscus | 4 (44.44) | 5 (55.56) | 0.49* |
| Around solid organs | 9 (47.37) | 10 (52.63) | 0.33 |
*Fisher’s exact test
Temperature associations
Higher ambient room temperatures were significantly associated with increased BAT uptake at perivascular, periviscus, and solid organ sites (P < 0.01). Conversely, lower external maximum and minimum temperatures were linked to higher BAT uptake at similar sites, indicating that BAT activity increases in colder conditions to aid thermogenesis. The explanation for this remarkable observation was that during the winter season, the external temperature was significantly lower than the ambient room temperature [Figures 1,2 and Tables 5-7].

| Sites of brown fat uptake | Yes | No | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Between the anterior neck muscles and supraclavicular fossa | 29.83±6.37 | - | - |
| Under the clavicles | 28.80±6.40 | 31.81±5.81 | <0.01 |
| In the axilla | 28.87±6.68 | 30.58±5.99 | 0.14 |
| Anterior abdominal wall | 21.50±6.36 | 29.94±6.29 | 0.08 |
| Inguinal fossa | - | 29.82±6.34 | - |
| Perivascular | 20.12±4.99 | 31.17±5.25 | <0.01 |
| Periviscus | 22.56±3.13 | 30.32±6.21 | <0.01 |
| Around solid organs | 20.37±4.94 | 31.32±5.15 | <0.01 |
| Sites of brown fat uptake | Yes | No | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Between the anterior neck muscles and supraclavicular fossa | 16.35±5.74 | - | - |
| Under the clavicles | 16.05±6.02 | 16.83±5.13 | 0.29 |
| In the axilla | 16.27±6.34 | 16.35±5.23 | 0.66 |
| Anterior abdominal wall | 10.50±2.12 | 16.40±5.73 | 0.10 |
| Inguinal fossa | - | 16.31±5.73 | - |
| Perivascular | 10.92±3.41 | 17.07±5.59 | <0.01 |
| Periviscus | 12.22±2.91 | 16.60±5.78 | 0.02 |
| Around solid organs | 11.04±3.16 | 17.15±5.61 | <0.01 |
| Sites of brown fat uptake | Yes | No | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Between the anterior neck muscles and supraclavicular fossa | 20.08±0.93 | - | - |
| Under the clavicles | 20.07±0.90 | 20.08±0.98 | 0.95 |
| In the axilla | 20.21±0.93 | 19.97±0.92 | 0.13 |
| Anterior abdominal wall | 21.35±1.48 | 20.06±0.91 | 0.08 |
| Inguinal fossa | - | 20.08±0.93 | - |
| Perivascular | 21.14±1.04 | 19.93±0.81 | <0.01 |
| Periviscus | 21.34±1.01 | 19.99±0.86 | <0.01 |
| Around solid organs | 21.19±1.06 | 19.90±0.77 | <0.01 |
Discussion
This study underscores the complex interactions between demographic, environmental, and physiological factors in regulating BAT activity. There is a significant association between gender and BAT uptake under the clavicles. The correlation between environmental temperatures and BAT activity supports the thermogenic role of BAT, which becomes more active in colder environments to maintain body temperature. The distribution of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avid brown fat uptake in our study was: Between anterior neck muscles and supraclavicular fossa, under the clavicles, in the axilla, perivascular, around solid organs, periviscus, and anterior abdominal wall-in descending order [Figure 2 and Table 8].

| Sites of brown fat uptake | Yes | No | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Between the anterior neck muscles and supraclavicular fossa | 19.61±4.53 | - | - |
| Under the clavicles | 19.83±4.59 | 19.13±4.39 | 0.43 |
| In the axilla | 19.26±4.33 | 19.86±4.68 | 0.52 |
| Anterior abdominal wall | 18.99±1.69 | 19.60±4.55 | 0.96 |
| Inguinal fossa | - | 19.59±4.52 | - |
| Perivascular | 22.32±3.56 | 19.21±4.52 | <0.01 |
| Periviscus | 21.49±3.52 | 19.46±4.56 | 0.16 |
| Around solid organs | 22.24±2.99 | 19.18±4.58 | <0.01 |
BAT is contributing to nonshivering thermogenesis. It is active under cold stress via sympathetic nervous system activation. There is evidence that BAT may also be active at thermo-neutrality and in a postprandial state. BAT has superior energy dissipation capacity compared to white adipose tissue and muscles.[1]
Specific regions of functionally active BAT are present in humans and are seen more frequently in women than men. [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography. can noninvasively quantify this specific distribution. BAT is inversely correlated with body mass index, especially in older people, suggesting a potential role in adult human metabolism through regulating the energy expenditure by thermogenesis mediated by the expression of uncoupling protein 1.[2]
BAT activity is related to the anthropometric factors, metabolic syndrome, and the beta-receptors’ activity.[3] Neoplastic status is determinant for BAT activity in patients living in the tropics.[4]
A study observed that higher total Brown fat FDG uptake is seen in younger patients, whereas sex, BMI, height, mass, outdoor temperature, and blood parameters are not significantly affecting total or depot of specific BAT activity.[5]
Hypermetabolic brown fat is also seen in the mediastinum, and knowledge of this potential pitfall, as well as other important places of distribution, is important in preventing misinterpretation as malignancy.[6]
A study of 6867 patients demonstrated FDG uptake in the brown fat in 298 (4.33%) patients. And prevalence of brown fat was significantly higher in females, the most common location was the neck and above the clavicle, and the least common area was the axilla.[7]
The presence of brown fat on FDG PET can lead to misinterpretation and unnecessary usage of various invasive tests. This can be avoided during performing FDG PET CT scan by using measures such as ensuring warm ambient temperature to the patient, thus reducing FDG uptake in brown fat before the procedure, and correlating it at a specific anatomic location with PET/CT fusion imaging.[8]
On examination and interpretation of FDG PET/CT scan, it is mandatory that the PET images are correlated with CT images and Hounsfield Units of specific locations/areas, thus minimizing the false-positive findings.[9]
Analyzing all the confounding factors influencing BAT and retrospective confirmation of previously identified factors with a larger data set can be used to more accurately identify patients at risk for BAT activation to develop prevention strategies before performing FDG PET CT scan.[10]
Our findings highlight key factors influencing BAT uptake, contributing to the understanding of its role in human metabolism.
There was no association between BMI levels and the site of subcutaneous fat uptake, except for brown fat uptake around solid organs. Individuals within the normal BMI category (18.5–24.9 kg/m2) had the highest percentage of brown fat uptake around solid organs as compared to higher and lower BMI categories. The Chi-square test of independence (Fisher’s exact test in case of expected cell frequency <5) was used to test the association.
A statistically significant association was observed between gender and brown fat uptake under the clavicles. A higher percentage of females (60, 65.22%) had brown fat uptake under the clavicles as compared to males (32, 34.78%). The Chi-square test of independence (Fisher’s exact test in case of expected cell frequency <5) was used to test the association.
Statistically significant lower maximum temperature of the outside environment was associated with brown fat uptake under the clavicles, perivascular, periviscus, and around solid organs. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the distribution of temperature between individuals with or without brown fat uptake at different sites.
Statistically significant lower minimum temperature of the outside environment was associated with brown fat uptake at perivascular, periviscus, and around solid organs. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the distribution of temperature between individuals with or without brown fat uptake at different sites.
Statistically significantly higher ambient room temperature was associated with brown fat uptake at perivascular, periviscus, and around solid organs. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the distribution of temperature between individuals with or without brown fat uptake at different sites.
Significantly higher BMI was associated with higher brown fat uptake at the perivascular site and around solid organs. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the distribution of BMI between individuals with or without brown fat uptake at different sites.
Conclusion
Our findings highlight key factors and confounding factors influencing BAT uptake, contributing to the understanding of its role in human metabolism. Our study data set can help to accurately identify patients at risk for BAT activation and thus use preventive strategies before performing FDG PET CT scan. Future research should explore the underlying mechanisms driving these associations and their implications for metabolic health interventions.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Nil.
References
- Brown adipose tissue: Activation and metabolism in humans. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2023;38:214-22.
- [Google Scholar]
- Identification and importance of brown adipose tissue in adult humans. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1509-17.
- [Google Scholar]
- Determinants of activity of brown adipose tissue in lymphoma patients. Sci Rep. 2020;10:21802.
- [Google Scholar]
- The relationship between brown adipose tissue activity and neoplastic status: An (18)F-FDG PET/CT study in the tropics. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:238.
- [Google Scholar]
- Active brown fat during (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging defines a patient group with characteristic traits and an increased probability of brown fat redetection. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1104-10.
- [Google Scholar]
- Focal FDG uptake in mediastinal brown fat mimicking malignancy: A potential pitfall resolved on PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1127-32.
- [Google Scholar]
- Brown fat at PET/CT: Correlation with patient characteristics. Radiology. 2012;263:836-42.
- [Google Scholar]
- Brown fat: Atypical locations and appearances encountered in PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:359-66.
- [Google Scholar]
- Patterns of brown fat uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan. Indian J Nucl Med. 2015;30:320-2.
- [Google Scholar]
- Factors influencing brown fat activation in FDG PET/CT: a retrospective analysis of 15,000+ cases. Br J Radiol. 2017;90:20170093. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170093
- [Google Scholar]
