Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
26 (
2
); 120-122
doi:
10.4103/0972-3919.90270

Anomalously placed suprahepatic gall-bladder: A case detected on F-18 FDG PET/CT

Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Medanta – The Medicity Hospital, Sector-38, Gurgaon, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Vishal Agarwal, Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Medanta – The Medicity Hospital, Sector-38, Gurgaon-122 001, India. E-mail: stanley2005vishal@yahoo.com

Licence

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to appraise the imageologists of a possible mislocalization of tracer accumulation to anomalously placed gallbladder during positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) examination. PET/CT is increasingly playing an important role in staging and restaging of the disease process in cancer patients. With the advent of fusion imaging, the tracer accumulation can be correctly localized to a structure or lesion on CT. We did a staging PET/CT scan of a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplant evaluation. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) was used as a tracer and the scan was performed on SEIMENS Biograph-mCT PET/CT machine. We noted the tracer accumulation at the superior surface of liver, which was localized to the anomalously placed gallbladder in suprahepatic subdiaphragmatic location. The anomalously placed gallbladder can create localization confusion. Keeping the possibility of ectopically placed gallbladder in mind, the imageologist can better localize the tracer uptake.

Keywords

Mislocalization
PET/CT
suprahepatic gallbladder

INTRODUCTION

When the gallbladder is not visualized in its normal location, the possibility of its ectopic location should be considered. A case of incidentally detected anomalous position of gall bladder causing confounding problem in interpretation of PET-CT is described.

CASE REPORT

A 70-year-old man, with h/o chronic liver disease and suspected of hepatocellular carcinoma [serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) 5024 ng/ml] was subjected to fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-18 FDG PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging. A focal FDG avid soft tissue was noted in the suprahepatic subdiaphragmatic location. Rest of the liver revealed non-FDG avid lesions in segments III and VIII. On viewing the fused PET/CT images, the radiotracer accumulation was localized to the anomalously placed suprahepatic gallbladder. Magnetic resonance (MR) images of the same patient confirmed the presence of the suprahepatic gallbladder [Figure 1].

(a) Transaxial view of PET image showing suprahepatic subdiaphragmatic gallbladder with tracer uptake; (b) Coronal view of PET image; (c) Sagittal view of PET image; (d) Transaxial view of CT image; (e) Coronal view of CT image; (f) Sagittal view of CT image; (g) Transaxial view of post-contrast T1-weighted MRI image; (h) Coronal view of post-contrast T1-weighted MRI image; (i) Transaxial view of T2 fat saturated MRI image shows gallbladder as a bright structure
Figure 1 (a) Transaxial view of PET image showing suprahepatic subdiaphragmatic gallbladder with tracer uptake; (b) Coronal view of PET image; (c) Sagittal view of PET image; (d) Transaxial view of CT image; (e) Coronal view of CT image; (f) Sagittal view of CT image; (g) Transaxial view of post-contrast T1-weighted MRI image; (h) Coronal view of post-contrast T1-weighted MRI image; (i) Transaxial view of T2 fat saturated MRI image shows gallbladder as a bright structure

DISCUSSION

Routine imaging of the gallbladder demonstrates a wide array of imaging variants, including anomalies in location, number, and configuration. An awareness of these normal variants would prevent misdiagnosis and aid in the assessment of differential diagnostic possibilities.

Normally, the gallbladder is situated adjacent to the inferior surface of the liver, in the plane of the interlobar fissure, with the gallbladder neck maintaining a constant relationship to porta hepatis. The gallbladder is generally found in the right upper quadrant, but may be seen in other parts of the abdomen. While anomalous positions are rare, the most common of these are (1) under the left hepatic lobe, (2) intrahepatic, (3) transverse, and (4) retroplaced (retrohepatic or retroperitoneal). The lesser common of these are (1) supradiaphragmatic and (2) suprahepatic. Gallbladder is intrahepatic during the embryonic period and becomes extrahepatic only later. An intrahepatic gallbladder[1] (usually a congenital anomaly) has a subcapsular location along the anterior inferior right lobe of the liver. This poses a problem for scintigraphy, as an intrahepatic gallbladder can cause a focal defect[2] (pseudo–space-occupying lesion); ultrasonography can be helpful in these cases. A left-sided gallbladder location is seen in situs inversus totalis. A gallbladder in the left upper quadrant without situs inversus is even rarer. The retroplaced gallbladder is rare and is either congenital or acquired. Gallbladder rotation and/or displacement can be caused by hepatic lobe abnormalities, viz. aplasia, hypoplasia and hypertrophy, or by abnormal mobility of the gallbladder itself.

The suprahepatic region is among the rarest sites, and very few reports have appeared in either the surgical or radiological literature.[35]

Of the very few reports on the suprahepatic gallbladder, one refers to a normally inserted organ that rotated 180° upward to an intrathoracic position after eventration of the diaphragm. In two other cases, an abnormally mobile gallbladder was found trapped between the chest wall and the upper border of the liver; this became symptomatic and caught the attention of the clinician and the imageologist.[5] Faintuch et al. reported three cases of suprahepatic gallbladder with hypoplasia of the right hepatic lobe and upward migration of the gallbladder.[6] Gansbeke reported a case of suprahepatic gallbladder which was associated with hepatomegaly due to macronodular cirrhosis complicating existing hepatitis.[7] Kabaroudis reported a case of floating gallbladder associated with hypoplasia of the right hepatic lobe,[8] whereas Maeda had reported a similar case associated with hypoplasia of left hepatic lobe.[9]

CONCLUSION

PET-CT is found to be useful in diagnosing this rare anatomical variant of ectopically located gall bladder and predicting its functional implication.

Source of Support: Nil.

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. , , . Congenital abnormalities of gallbladder: 101 cases. Instr Abstr Surg. 1956;103:439-57.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Liver scanning and the intrahepatic gallbladder: Case report. J Nucl Med. 1975;16:1029-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Congenital anomalies of gallbladder: A report of 148 cases with report of a double gallbladder. Arch Surg. 1936;32:131-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Imaging of gallbladder variants. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:1205-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Suprahepatic position of the gallbladder. Arch Surg. 1965;90:175-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Suprahepatic gallbladder with hypoplasia of the right lobe of the liver. Arch Surg. 1980;115:658-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Suprahepatic gallbladder: A rare congenital anomaly. Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9:341-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Hypoplasia of the right hepatic lobe combined with a floating gallbladder. Acta Chir Belg. 2003;103:425-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Hypoplasia of the left hepatic lobe associated with floating gallbladder: A case report. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45:1100-3.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections