Translate this page into:
An Easily Overlooked Cause of High Level of Free Pertechnetate in Lung Perfusion Scintigraphy with 99mTc-MAA Resulting From Improper Kit Reconstitution
Address for correspondence: Dr. Mohsen Qutbi, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Taleghani Hospital, Yaman St., Velenjak, Tehran 1985711151, Iran. E-mail: mohsen.qutbi@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Sir,
There is a diverse range of sources of error that renders 99mTc-MAA lung perfusion scintigraphy unsuitable for interpretation by nonnegligible extrapulmonary uptake, as a result of poor radiolabeling efficiency. Most of the time, unbound “free” pertechnetate in the reconstituted solution is the main issue. When injected to the patient, though a high level of free pertechnetate in the circulation, accumulation of radioactivity in salivary glands, thyroid and gastric mucosa would be evident. Poor radiolabeling also results from a number of causes including quality of locally available commercial kits, incorrect order of reconstitution steps, excessive amount of eluted technetium added to the vial and even adding a disproportionate volume of normal saline to the vial before labeling.[123] The latter is of serious concern in laboratories with infrequent number of lung perfusion scans on a daily basis. Because in such situations, each vial is mostly used for one or few number of patients. The hot laboratory technician, in order to decrease the amount of activity required to inject into the vial and thus avoid wasting the eluted activity, might considerably reduce the number of particles in the MAA vial by adding normal saline, i.e., particle dilution, and then draw a proportion, say almost one half, then adding the pertechnetate. This violation of the instructions provided by the kit manufacturer may lead to poor labeling as that in our 82-year-old patient referred for the evaluation of pulmonary thromboembolism. The commercially available MAA kit, used regularly in our laboratory, contains 2–4 million particles and the manufacturer recommends adding a dose of 40 mCi. The first scan is performed by the 99mTc-MAA kit prepared incorrectly by the technician in our laboratory, i.e., by particle dilution to reduce the number of particles, and the second scan is repeated another day by the kit of the same batch number, but with exact following the reconstitution steps recommended in the package insert [Figure 1]. Taken together, the discussion above again emphasizes the adherence to supplied instructions for preparation and use of radiopharmaceuticals, particularly avoiding dilution of particles and using a small volume of reconstitution in vial to obtain an optimal result.[13]

Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- The preparation parameters of technetium-99m-macroaggregated albumin-low particle number. J Nucl Med Technol. 1994;22:173-7.
- [Google Scholar]
- 2008. The Radiopharmacy A Technologist's Guide. European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Available from: https://www.eanm.org/content-eanm/uploads/2016/11/tech_radiopharmacy.pdf
- 2008. Technetium-99m Radiopharmaceuticals: Manufacture of Kits, Technical Reports Series No 466. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; Available from: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/trs466_web.pdf