Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
39 (
3
); 170-176
doi:
10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_8_24

An Analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of Tc-99m PSMA SSPECT/CT in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer Compared with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT: A Single-center, Prospective Study

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
Department of Urology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Manish Ora, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow - 226 014, Uttar Pradesh, India. E-mail: drmanishora@yahoo.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Objective:

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after initial management of Prostate Carcinoma (PC) is frequent. Subsequent interventions rely on disease burden and metastasis distribution. 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) is an excellent imaging modality in BCR. However, 68Ga is radionuclide generator produced and has restricted availability. 99mTc-labeled PSMA could be a potential cost-effective alternative. We compared the performance of 99mTc-PSMA single-photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in BCR with a serum prostate surface antigen (PSA) level of <20 ng/mL.

Materials and Methods:

The prospective study included 25 patients with BCR and at least one lesion on a 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. All patients underwent 99 mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT, and disease distribution and metastatic burden were compared with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were computed and analyzed.

Results:

The mean age and serum PSA (SPSA) were 69.72 ± 6.69 years and 5.65 ± 6.07 ng/mL. Eleven patients (44%) had SPSA ≤2 ng/mL. Recurrent sites were noted in the prostate (19, 76%), prostatic bed (3, 12%), and pelvis lymph nodes (LNs) (13, 52%). Distant metastasis to bones (13, 52%), lungs (5, 20%), and retroperitoneal LNs (2, 8%) were noted. Both modalities were concordant for the recurrent disease at the prostate, prostatic bed, bone, and lung lesions. 99mTc-PSMA could localize pelvis LNs in most patients (10/13, 76.9%). The site-specific sensitivity and specificity between the two modalities were not significantly different (P > 0.05). TBR shows excellent correlation with SUVmax (0.783, P < 0.001). Four (16%) patients were understaged with 99mTc-PSMA due to the nonvisualization of the subcentimeter size LNs. No patient with systemic metastases was understaged.

Conclusions:

99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT has good concordance with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in BCR, even at low PSA levels. However, it may miss a few subcentimeter LNs due to lower resolution. 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT could be a simple, cost-effective, and readily available imaging alternative to PET/CT.

Keywords

68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography
99mTc-prostate-specific membrane antigen single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography
biochemical recurrence
prostate cancer

Introduction

Prostate Carcinoma (PC) is the most prevalent cancer in men worldwide, accounting for approximately 21% of diagnosed cancers.[1] Following initial management, consistently detectable raised serum prostate surface antigen (PSA) indicates a residual tumor. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) is defined as an elevated PSA >0.2 ng/mL or 2.0 ng/mL following radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy.[2] PC recurrence after prostatectomy occurs in 20%–35% of cases, with a median time of 2–3 years after surgery.[3] Accurate identification of the recurrence site/s is paramount for further management. Individuals encountering localized recurrences may meet the criteria for curative interventions.[4]

Imaging plays a pivotal role in the management of BCR. Imaging helps to identify and differentiate the local recurrence from oligometastases and disseminated metastatic disease. It facilitates the identification of optimal management strategies and prognostication. Radiographic progression without raised PSA is not infrequent in metastatic castration-resistant PC patients treated with enzalutamide. Therefore, relying exclusively on PSA in follow-up without concurrent imaging may inadvertently overlook disease progression.[5] Bone scans and computed tomography (CT) have limited value in BCR, especially when PSA serum levels are below 10 ng/mL. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is valuable for identifying local recurrence.[6] However, MRI usually images a limited field of view. At BCR, performing a sensitive investigation to detect small lesions and, preferably, whole-body imaging is crucial.

Functional imaging targeting overexpression of prostate surface membrane antigen (PSMA) in PC cells is novel. PSMA expression correlates with Gleason score, probability of recurrence, or disease progression.[78] In BCR, 68Ga PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/CT is promising. It detects more lesions (63.8%) than bone scans and CT (45.3%). One-fourth of recurrent PC lesions are found only on 68Ga PSMA PET/CT.[9] It has excellent sensitivity (96.8%) at a PSA level of more than 2 ng/mL. It could detect lesions even at a low level of PSA (<0.2 ng/mL), albeit at lower sensitivity (57.9%).[10] Available PET radiopharmaceuticals such as 68Ga-PSMA-11, 18F-PSMA-1007, and 18F-DCFPyl have similar performance.[11] However, 68Ga is a generator (68Ge/68Ga) produced isotope. The radioactivity output during each elution is restricted, limiting the number of patients that can undergo imaging. The generating system’s availability, life, and running costs are decisive factors.[12]

99mTc-labeled PSMA is envisioned as a practical and affordable solution to 68Ga PSMA PET/CT.[13] 99mTc is eluted from a 99Mo/99mTc generator. Even in the modest nuclear medicine laboratory, there is a substantial amount of 99mTc-Pertechnatate on hand. A head-to-head comparison of the 99mTc-PSMA single-photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has shown comparable detection rates.[14] 99mTc-PSMA-I&S-SPECT/CT show excellent lesion detection in the BCR (82.9% and 100% at PSA >4 ng/mL and >10 ng/mL). Although, this tracer has a lower detection rate (20%) at a lower PSA level (< 1 ng/ml).[15] However, these small retrospective studies included diverse patients with variable and higher PSA levels. The precise performance of the 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT is largely unknown at a lower level of raised PSA (<20 ng/mL). We aimed to prospectively evaluate the performance of 99mTc PSMA SPECT/CT compared to 68Ga PSMA PET/CT in BCR.

Materials and Methods

Patient population

This prospective study was done in a tertiary care teaching hospital between January 2020 and June 2022. It included PC patients with BCR referred for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for restaging. All patients with positive 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans were subjected to a 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT study under the approved protocol. The institutional ethics committee approved the study (2019-101-IMP-109). All patients were informed about the protocol and gave written consent for the study.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histopathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma prostate

  • Patients who have received primary management for PC (prostatectomy ± lymph node [LN] dissection and/or external radiotherapy and/or antiandrogen therapy and/or chemotherapy)

  • The patient presents with BCR in follow-up.[2]

Exclusion criteria

  • SPSA more than 20 ng/mL

  • Patients with a lower level of persistent PSA after prostatectomy (PSA <0.2 ng/mL) or radiation therapy (PSA <2 ng/mL)

  • Patient with negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan

  • Histopathology (HPE) other than adenocarcinoma

  • History of malignancy other than PC.

68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography protocol

No specific patient preparation was required for the study. Gallium-68 was obtained from a 68Ge/68Ga radionuclide generator (IGG100, Eckert and Ziegler Radiopharma GmBH, Berlin, Germany). Radiolabelling of PSMA-11 was done per the manufacturer’s instructions (ABX Biochemicals GmbH). Patients were administered 1.5–2 MBq/kg of the radiotracer intravenously. The patients were kept hydrated and instructed to empty their bladders regularly. A PET/CT scan (vertex-mid-thigh) was done 60 min after injection on a Biograph™ PET/CT scanner (Siemens Healthineers). Noncontrast CT was performed with CareDose® automatic modulation for keV and mA with a slice thickness of 2 mm, pitch 0.813, rotation time 0.5 s, and FOV 500 mm. PET scan was acquired from the vertex to mid-thigh at 3 min per bed position in three-dimensional (3D) mode. The CT scan was used for anatomical localization and attenuation correction of PET emission data. PET data were reconstructed using a 3D ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm (two iterations, 21 subsets, Gaussian filter 2.0 mm, matrix size 400 × 400, and slice thickness 2.0 mm).

99mTc-prostate-specific membrane antigen single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography

99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT study was done within 7 days of the PET/CT study. No specific patient preparation was required. The PSMA-T4 kit (Tricine-EDDA; Polatom, Poland) was labeled with 99mTc-pertechnetate per the supplier’s instructions. Patients were given ~740 MBq of 99mTc-PSMA. The patients were kept hydrated and instructed to empty their bladders regularly. A GE Infinia Hawkeye camera was used to perform imaging 2 h later. A whole-body planar acquisition was done (exposure time per pixel: 180 s and pallet velocity: 13 cm/min, stored in a 1024 × 256 matrix). SPECT/CT of the thorax and the abdomen-pelvis region was done in step and shoot protocol. It was acquired at 30 sec/view over 360° and stored in a 128 × 128 matrix with a window of 15% centered on 140 keV and scattering correction. Low-dose CT was performed with a current of 2.5 mA, voltage 140 kV, and matrix size 512 × 512.

Image interpretation

Two skilled nuclear medicine physicians (Manish Ora and Sanjay Gambhir with more than 5 years of experience reporting 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) independently and anonymously assessed the images. All analyses were done on syngo.via (Siemens Healthineers). 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans were categorized as normal or abnormal. All areas of nonphysiological tracer uptake higher than the background were considered pathological. The CT scan confirmed the findings to rule out physiological uptake and ascertain pathological lesions. The prostate, prostatic bed (for patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy), pelvic lymph nodes, nonregional LNs, and other metastatic locations were evaluated in all the scans. We reevaluated delayed and postvoid images for suspicious findings. CT images were evaluated for nonavid metastatic lung nodules. In case of discrepancy between readers, a consensus was obtained.

The planar and SPECT/CT scans of every patient were separately assessed. The images of SPECT/CT were processed in the Xeleris workstation (GE Healthcare). Like PET/CT, all areas of nonphysiological tracer uptake higher than the background were considered pathological. The prostate and other areas of interest were evaluated in all the scans. To get reference counts, a region of interest (ROI) was marked on the gluteal muscles. On all abnormal uptakes, ROIs were created, and the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) was computed.

Data analysis and reference standard

PET/CT diagnostic criteria were hypermetabolic foci with a definite CT finding suggesting malignancy. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was measured. A true positive was defined as a match between the SPECT and PET images. False negatives were considered in cases SPECT/CT failed to detect the disease site detected on PET/CT. We considered any areas of abnormally increased uptake on the SPECT/CT with no uptake on the PET/CT as false positives.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented in median (interquartile range) and mean ± standard deviation, whereas categorical variables were in number and frequency (%). The McNamara test was used to test the change in proportions between the two methods. The sensitivity and specificity of the 99mTc PSMA were calculated considering 68Ga PSMA PET/CT as the gold standard. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Statistical Package for the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, was used for data analysis.

Results

Patient profile

Twenty-five patients with PC were included in the study. The mean age of the patient was 69.7 ± 6.7 years. The most common Gleason scores of the tumor were 4 + 4 and 4 + 5 (6 patients each, 24%). Radical prostatectomy and orchidectomy were done in 6 patients (24%) each. SPSA level was 5.65 ± 6.07 ng/mL. Eleven patients (44%) had SPSA levels of less or equal to 2 ng/mL [Table 1].

Table 1 Distribution of demographic and other variables in study patients (n=25)
Variables Values*
Age (years) 70 (65–76) (69.72±6.69)
Gleason score 7 (7–8.5) (7.36±1.32)
PSA (ng/mL) 3.11 (0.79–9.73) (5.65±6.07)
Prostatectomy (yes) 6 (24)
Orchidectomy (yes) 6 (24)
Hormonal/chemotherapy (yes) 17 (68)
SUVmax (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT)
 Prostatic mass (19 patients) 14 (7–17) (13.21±7.3)
 Pelvic LN (13 patients) 14 (4.3–20) (15.7±14.7)
 Retroperitoneal LN (2 patients) 2.5 (2–NA) (2.5±0.71)
 Bone (13 patients) 13 (3–31.25) (16.63±16.27)
 Lung (5 patients) 6.5 (6–NA) (6.5±0.71)
 Operative bed (3 patients) 15 (7–NA) (19.33±14.98)

*Continuous variables presented in median (Q1–Q3) (mean±SD)/frequency (%) maximum standard uptake value. NA: Not applicable, PSA: Prostate surface antigen, PSMA: Prostate-specific membrane antigen, PET: Positron emission tomography, CT: Computed tomography, LN: Lymph node, SD: Standard deviation

68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography

All PET/CT scans revealed at least one avid lesion. The most common findings were primary prostatic mass (19, 76%). SUVmax of the prostatic mass lesions was 13.21 ± 7.3. Seminal vesicle and urinary bladder involvement was noted in 7 (28%) and 6 (24%) patients. Three patients had prostatic bed recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Pelvis LNs were noted in the 13 patients (52%). The most common sites of metastases were bones (13, 52%), lungs (5, 20%), and retroperitoneal LNs (2, 8%), respectively. In all patients having a recurrence in prostatic mass or prostate bed, concurrent pelvis LN, retroperitoneal LN, and bone metastases were noted in 12, 2, and 11 patients, respectively. SUVmax of the lesions is detailed in Table 1.

99mTc-prostate-specific membrane antigen single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography

The 99mTc-PSMA study could identify at least a pathological site in all the patients. The findings were concordant with the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for localizing pathology at the prostatic bed, prostatic mass, bones, and lung metastases [Table 2]. It could localize pelvis LNs in most patients (10/13, 76.9%) [Figure 1]. However, it could not pick up the pelvis and retroperitoneal LN involvement in three (3/13, 23.1%) patients and one (1/2, 50%) patient [Figure 2]. The mean TBR was 9.6 ± 6.4. TBR shows a good positive correlation with SUVmax (0.783, P < 0.001) [Figure 3]. There was no significant (P > 0.05) difference in site-specific sensitivity and specificity between both modalities [Table 2].

Table 2 Sensitivity and specificity of 99mTc prostate surface membrane antigen scan compared with 68Ga-prostate surface membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (n=25)
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT# 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT P$
Sensitivity, n (%) Specificity, n (%)
Prostatic bed (3/22) 3 (100) 22 (100) 0.99
Prostatic mass (19/6) 19 (100) 6 (100) 0.99
Pelvis LNs (13/12) 10 (76.9) 12 (100) 0.25
Retroperitoneal LNs (2/23) 1 (50) 22 (95.7) 0.99
Urinal bladder invasion (6/19) 6 (100) 19 (100) 0.99
Seminal vesicle invasion (7/18) 7 (100) 18 (100) 0.99
Bone (13/12) 13 (100) 12 (100) 0.99
Lung (5/20) 5 (100) 20 (100) 0.99

#In 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: The parenthesis shows the number of patients with present and absent disease in a particular region, McNemar test was used to test the difference between the two methods, $P<0.05 significant. PSMA: Prostate-specific membrane antigen, PET: Positron emission tomography, CT: Computed tomography, LNs: Lymph nodes

A 68-year–old male patient with Prostate cancer (PC)(Gleason score 4 + 3) presented with biochemical recurrence and prostate surface antigen level 10.95 ng/mL. (a) 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) Maximum Intensity projection image(MIP) showing abnormal tracer uptake in the prostatic region (blue arrow) and focal uptake in the abdominal region (red arrow), (b) 99mTC-PSMA MIP also reveals abnormal tracer uptake at these sites (blue and red arrows). Axial fused positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), (c and d) At the prostatic level show prostatic lesion (red arrow) and left common iliac lymph node (white arrow). 99mTC-PSMA PET/CT, (e and f) Same findings (red and white arrows)
Figure 1 A 68-year–old male patient with Prostate cancer (PC)(Gleason score 4 + 3) presented with biochemical recurrence and prostate surface antigen level 10.95 ng/mL. (a) 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) Maximum Intensity projection image(MIP) showing abnormal tracer uptake in the prostatic region (blue arrow) and focal uptake in the abdominal region (red arrow), (b) 99mTC-PSMA MIP also reveals abnormal tracer uptake at these sites (blue and red arrows). Axial fused positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), (c and d) At the prostatic level show prostatic lesion (red arrow) and left common iliac lymph node (white arrow). 99mTC-PSMA PET/CT, (e and f) Same findings (red and white arrows)
A 72-year-old patient with Prostate Cancer (PC) (Gleason score 4 + 4) presented with biochemical recurrence and serum prostate surface antigen level of 0.36 ng/mL. (a): 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) Maximum Intensity Projection image (MIP) showing abnormal tracer uptake in the prostatic region (blue arrow), (b) 99mTC-PSMA MIP also reveals abnormal tracer uptake in the prostatic region (blue arrow). Axial fused positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), (c and d) At the prostatic level show prostatic lesion (red arrow) and left obturator lymph node (~7 mm in size) (yellow arrow). 99mTC-PSMA PET/CT, (e and f) tracer avidity in the prostate gland (red arrow). No abnormal uptake is noted in the lymph node (Yellow Arrows)
Figure 2 A 72-year-old patient with Prostate Cancer (PC) (Gleason score 4 + 4) presented with biochemical recurrence and serum prostate surface antigen level of 0.36 ng/mL. (a): 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) Maximum Intensity Projection image (MIP) showing abnormal tracer uptake in the prostatic region (blue arrow), (b) 99mTC-PSMA MIP also reveals abnormal tracer uptake in the prostatic region (blue arrow). Axial fused positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), (c and d) At the prostatic level show prostatic lesion (red arrow) and left obturator lymph node (~7 mm in size) (yellow arrow). 99mTC-PSMA PET/CT, (e and f) tracer avidity in the prostate gland (red arrow). No abnormal uptake is noted in the lymph node (Yellow Arrows)
Corresponding tumor-to-background ratio and SUVmax of each lesion. TBR: Tumor-to-background ratio
Figure 3 Corresponding tumor-to-background ratio and SUVmax of each lesion. TBR: Tumor-to-background ratio

Change in the restaging

Of 25 patients, 21 (84%) had concordant staging on 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Four patients were understaged by the 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT due to nonavidity of the subcentimeter-sized pelvis and retroperitoneal LNs. SPSA level of false-negative cases on SPECT/CT ranged from 3.1 to 16.1 ng/mL. None of the patients with systemic metastases was understaged. No false-positive finding was noted on the 99mTc-PSMA scan.

Discussion

Study findings

We conducted a prospective study in PC patients with BCR and evidence of the disease on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. We compared 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT findings with 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT. It included 25 patients with a mean SPSA level of 5.65 ± 6.07 ng/mL. The most common findings were primary prostatic mass with or without local invasion, regional-nonregional LNs, and bone and lung metastases. The 99mTc-PSMA study showed at least a lesion in all the patients. The findings were concordant between 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 99mTc-PSMA in all locations except the pelvis and retroperitoneal LNs. In four patients, 99mTc-PSMA could not visualize subcentimeter-sized pelvis and retroperitoneum LNs, resulting in an understaging.

Current role of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography and performance in recurrent PC

BCR after the initial management of PC is not uncommon. It is seen in about 20%–40% of patients following radical prostatectomy and 30%–50% after radiotherapy.[16] A PSA level >0.2 ng/mL measured 6–13 weeks after radical prostatectomy is considered a BCR.[17] It is worthwhile to note the propensity of metastasis in PC. In an autopsy series including 1589 PC patients, metastases were detected in 35%. Bone metastases were most common (90%), followed by lung (46%), liver (25%), pleura (21%), and adrenal involvement (13%). Most skeletal lesions (90%) involved the vertebrae.[18] It highlights the importance of whole-body imaging in PC. PSMA PET/CT is an emerging modality that has an unparalleled role in the staging of PCs and is more accurate than CT and bone scans.[9] We found systemic metastasis (M1a or M1b stage) in 14 patients (56%). Localized imaging targeting the abdomen and pelvis could have missed lungs and distant skeletal metastases.

PSMA PET/CT helps to evaluate local recurrence and unveil distant metastasis in BCR after radical prostatectomy.[9] It has good sensitivity and specificity of 76% (74–78) and 45% (27–58) for detecting PC recurrence and restaging (35 studies, 3910 patients).[19] It is a sensitive technique even at low PSA levels and has a detection rate of 57.9% and 72.7% for PSA levels 0.2–0.5 and 0.5–1 ng/mL, respectively. Excellent detection rates (93.0%) are noted in patients with more than 1 ng/mL.[10] In our study, eight patients had a PSA level of <1 ng/mL.

99mTc HYNIC prostate-specific membrane antigen single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography as an alternative to prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography

The widespread use of PSMA PET/CT faces two critical obstacles. First is the limited availability of the 68Ga. It is generated using a 68Ge/68Ga generator with limited output. When compared to 18F tracers, the radioactivity yield is relatively low. Therefore, it is not feasible to perform a large number of patients.[12] The second is the PET/CT scanner’s limited availability. These led to the development and utilization of readily available 99mTc. 99mTc Hydrazinonicotinic acid (HYNIC) PSMA SPECT/CT detected all prostate (100%) and most bone lesions (91.7%) in a previous study by Lawal et al. However, it had a lower sensitivity for detecting the LN metastases (62.5%). All enlarged LNs (>1 centimeter) were detected. However, it could only localize 28% of subcentimeter-size LNs. The size of LNs (P = 0.033) and the SUVmax of lesions (P = 0.007) were significant predictors of lesion detection.[20] Similar results were noted in our study. We found an excellent sensitivity (100%) for detecting prostatic mass and bone lesions. High TBR leads to the identification of the many subcentimeter-sized LNs. However, the sensitivity was 76.9% and 50% for detecting pelvis and retroperitoneal LNs. We must note a small number of retroperitoneal LN (n = 2) in our study.

A large prospective study by Schmidkonz et al. evaluated the role of 99mTc-MIP1404-scintigraphy in 225 PC patients with BCR. Tracer-positive lesions were detected in 77% (174/225) of all patients. Local recurrence (25%), LNs (47%), bones (27%), and lungs (5%) were common sites of involvement. The detection rate was 90% at PSA levels ≥2 ng/mL.[21] Our study also found a similar trend in metastatic disease distribution. Schmidkonz et al. included patients with variable PSA levels (median PSA 3.5 ng/mL, 0.01–93). The authors noted no PSMA-positive lesion in 51 of 225 (23%) patients. In contrast, we included only those patients with at least one lesion 68Ga PET/CT scan. In another study, 23 patients with metastatic PC underwent 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-iPSMA SPECT/CT followed by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Sites considered positive were compared based on the SUVmax and TBR. SUVmax and TBR of prostate, bone, and LN lesions were (25.2 ± 4.7, 18.4 ± 1.6, and 11.4 ± 1.2 [P = 0.037]) and (35.9 ± 45.2, 15.4 ± 18.9, and 19.1 ± 51.7 [P = 0.035]), respectively. However, the study included patients with very high S PSA levels (mean = 80.85 ng/dL).[22] Our study found a high TBR correlated with the SUVmax.

Limitations and future directions

This study has a few important limitations. It is a single-center, small prospective study including 25 patients. We excluded patients with high SPSA levels (>20 mg/mL). There is a lack of histopathological confirmation of recurrent and metastatic sites, as obtaining the histopathology of all metastatic sites is impractical. The study included only patients with positive 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans, and positive findings on the PET/CT were considered pathological. Recent advancements in gamma camera technologies may further improve the resolution of SPET/CT. A larger prospective study with raised but low PSA levels (<20 ng/mL) is needed to confirm the study’s findings and cost-effectiveness. Based on the study findings, we may extrapolate the similar or better detection rate of the 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT in patients with higher PSA levels either at presentation or BCR.

Conclusions

In prostate cancer patients with elevated SPSA (<20 ng/mL), 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT performs similarly to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. It has concordance with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for prostatic masses, local recurrence, bones, and lung metastases with no (P > 0.05) difference in site-specific sensitivity and specificity. However, it may miss a few subcentimeter-sized LNs due to lower resolution. TBR shows a good correlation with SUVmax. The 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT could be a simple, cost-effective, and readily available imaging alternative of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in PC, overcoming the need for 68Ga radioisotopes. It could aid the widespread use of PSMA receptor-based functional imaging and radionuclide therapy in PC.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge our patients, without whom it was not possible to conduct the study.

References

  1. , , , . Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2005;294:433-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Standardizing the definition of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy-what prostate specific antigen cut point best predicts a durable increase and subsequent systemic progression? J Urol. 2016;195:1754-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Management of biochemical recurrence after primary curative treatment for prostate cancer: A review. Urol Int. 2018;100:251-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . Radiographic progression with nonrising PSA in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer:Post hoc analysis of PREVAIL. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017;20:221-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Current imaging techniques for and imaging spectrum of prostate cancer recurrence and metastasis: A pictorial review. Radiographics. 2020;40:709-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression as a predictor of prostate cancer progression. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:696-701.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . High level PSMA expression is associated with early PSA recurrence in surgically treated prostate cancer. Prostate. 2011;71:281-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus CT and bone scan for investigation of PSA failure post radical prostatectomy. Asian J Urol. 2021;8:170-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Evaluation of hybrid ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:668-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Comparing the diagnostic performance of radiotracers in recurrent prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:2978-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . [(68)Ga] Ga-PSMA-11: The first FDA-approved (68)Ga-radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging of prostate cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;14:713.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , . Preclinical evaluation and first patient application of 99mTc-PSMA-I and S for SPECT imaging and radioguided surgery in prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:235-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . Direct comparison of (99m)Tc-PSMA SPECT/CT and (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer. Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol. 2020;8:1-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . [(99cm)Tc] Tc-PSMA-I and S-SPECT/CT: Experience in prostate cancer imaging in an outpatient center. EJNMMI Res. 2020;10:45.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Use of different definitions of biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy changes conclusions about relative treatment efficacy for localized prostate cancer. Urology. 2006;68:593-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: The American Urological Association prostate guidelines for localized prostate cancer update panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol. 2007;177:540-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , . Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: An autopsy study of 1,589 patients. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:578-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , . 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (psma) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2021;47:705-29.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Diagnostic sensitivity of Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT in prostate carcinoma: A comparative analysis with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT. Prostate. 2017;77:1205-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . (99m) Tc-MIP-1404-SPECT/CT for the detection of PSMA-positive lesions in 225 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Prostate. 2018;78:54-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . Head to head comparison performance of (99m)Tc-EDDA/HYNIC-iPSMA SPECT/CT and (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT a prospective study in biochemical recurrence prostate cancer patients. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;8:332-40.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections