Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
33 (
4
); 345-347
doi:
10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_78_18

Adrenal Oncocytoma: An Incidental Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Findings with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlation

Department of Radiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Address for correspondence: Dr. Mohei Abouzied, Department of Radiology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, P.O. Box. 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia. E-mail: mohei.abouzied@gmail.com

Licence

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

A good percentage of adrenal masses in patients with known malignancy may be benign; thus, noninvasive characterization is important in preventing unnecessary biopsy. This case report represents a patient with papillary thyroid carcinoma and known lung metastasis for which she was followed up with whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) postradioactive iodine therapy. During the follow-up, she had developed an adrenal mass lesion seen by FDG PET/CT and further characterized by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This case demonstrates the potential importance of combining the molecular characterization by FDG PET/CT with the data derived from MRI in narrowing the differential diagnosis of an adrenal mass and suggesting the next diagnostic step in reaching the definitive diagnosis.

Keywords

Adrenal oncocytoma
fluorodeoxyglucose
magnetic resonance imaging
positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Introduction

The improvement of imaging technique has led to an increase in the incidentally discovered adrenal lesions. Characterization of such lesions has become a necessity and an increasingly common management scenario for endocrinologists and urologists. Functional imaging technique usually complement the rule of structural imaging with CT and MRI in reaching a sensible conclusion about most of these lesions as it will be illustrated in the case report.

Case Report

A 45-year-old female presented with a previous history of papillary thyroid carcinoma posttotal thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine ablation therapy.

She had developed lung metastases from thyroid origin for which she was followed up with whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) postradioactive iodine therapy.

A follow-up whole-body FDG PET/CT scan revealed a well-defined left adrenal mass lesion that had mild FDG uptake with a mean standardized uptake value (SUV) higher than both the liver and background SUV [Figure 1], which has been further characterized by a dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen [Figure 2al] showing a 3.4 cm × 3 cm, well-defined, fairly homogenous lesion anterosuperior to the left kidney, which demonstrates slightly low T2 signal intensity to the adjacent renal cortex on half-Fourier single-shot technique (a), T2 fat-saturated images (b), increased signal on diffusion images (c), and low signal on apparent diffusion coefficient map images (d), compatible with diffusion restriction. It has iso-signal intensity to the adjacent renal cortex on the in-phase T1-weighted images (e), without drop of signal on the opposed-phase images (f), excluding the presence of intracellular fat.

Coronal whole-body 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (a), axial computed tomography (b), axial positron emission tomography (c), and fused axial positron emission tomography/computed tomography (d) showing an well-defined 3.4-cm mass lesion (red arrow) involving the left adrenal region that has an standardized uptake value average of 1.7 with an average hounsfield unit of 37; its standardized uptake value average is slightly higher than the liver standardized uptake value average which is 1.2 that would be in favor of neoplastic process rather than benign adrenal adenoma
Figure 1
Coronal whole-body 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (a), axial computed tomography (b), axial positron emission tomography (c), and fused axial positron emission tomography/computed tomography (d) showing an well-defined 3.4-cm mass lesion (red arrow) involving the left adrenal region that has an standardized uptake value average of 1.7 with an average hounsfield unit of 37; its standardized uptake value average is slightly higher than the liver standardized uptake value average which is 1.2 that would be in favor of neoplastic process rather than benign adrenal adenoma
(a) Axial T2 half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo, (b) axial fat-saturated T2 fast spin echo, (c) axial diffusion, (d) apparent diffusion coefficient map, axial (e) in- and (f) out-of-phase T1 gradient echo, axial (g) pre- and postcontrast three-dimensional-gradient echo fat-saturated T1-weighted images during the (h) arterial, (i) portal venous, and (j) delayed phases, (k) coronal, and (l) sagittal postcontrast three-dimensional-gradient echo fat-saturated T1-weighted images
Figure 2
(a) Axial T2 half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo, (b) axial fat-saturated T2 fast spin echo, (c) axial diffusion, (d) apparent diffusion coefficient map, axial (e) in- and (f) out-of-phase T1 gradient echo, axial (g) pre- and postcontrast three-dimensional-gradient echo fat-saturated T1-weighted images during the (h) arterial, (i) portal venous, and (j) delayed phases, (k) coronal, and (l) sagittal postcontrast three-dimensional-gradient echo fat-saturated T1-weighted images

It demonstrates arterial hyperenhancement (h) and washes out on subsequent postcontrast images (i-j) splaying the left adrenal gland limbs (arrows, k-l), consistent with an adrenal origin. Overall findings are highly suspicious for a neoplastic adrenal lesion. Subsequently, the patient underwent open left adrenalectomy.

Five-centimeter of the left adrenal mass was resected for which the histopathology was consistent with oncocytic adrenocortical neoplasm of borderline category of uncertain malignant potential according to Lin–Weiss–Bisceglia system for the assessment of malignant potential in oncocytic adrenocortical tumors; this lesion was confined to the adrenal gland without vascular invasion and with free surgical margin.

Discussion

Oncocytic neoplasms are benign neoplasms that have been predominantly described in organs such as the kidney, thyroid, ovaries, lung, and salivary and pituitary glands.[1]

However, oncocytic adrenal cortical neoplasms are considered very rare, with only around fifty cases reported in English literature.[2]

Nonetheless, with the advancement of imaging techniques, recent literatures have demonstrated an increase in its detection by up to 5%.[3] Most of these “adrenal incidentalomas” are benign and nonfunctioning, discovered without its relation to the patient's underlying symptoms. Although extremely rare, malignant and functioning tumor cases have been reported simultaneously associated with Cushing's syndrome.[134]

Most adrenal oncocytomas have been reported between the ages of 27 and 72 years with female predisposition to male.[56] Grossly, these tumors are described as well-circumscribed, round encapsulated masses with areas of hemorrhage and cystic formation. Histologically, their cytoplasm is highly granular and eosinophilic due to the abundance of mitochondria.[7]

In our patient's clinical scenario, metastasis to the adrenal gland is considered one of the top differential diagnostic possibilities. The most common primary sites are the lung, breast, skin or integument (melanoma), kidney, thyroid gland, and colon.

Nearly 50% of adrenal masses incidentally detected in patients with cancer harbor metastases; most of them are silent, putting these patients at higher risk. Therefore, the characterization of these masses in this subset of patients is considered vital for noninvasive staging of the tumor, selection of the treatment regimen, and prediction of the prognosis.[8910]

FDG PET–CT can help to differentiate benign from malignant adrenal lesions with average diagnostic sensitivities of 93%–100%, specificities of 90%–96%, and accuracies of 92%–96%.[1011121314] Qualitative (visual) PET analysis has the best combined test sensitivity and specificity for PET characterization of malignant adrenal masses.[10]

Therefore, relying solely on the metabolic features and the patient's clinical history would favor the malignant potential of such lesion. However, MRI findings have supported further such hypothesis by excluding fat-rich adenoma based on the nondrop of signal on the opposed-phase-1-weighted images[15] and that contributed to an increase in the specificity of PET findings since benign adenoma might have shown the same metabolic features on the FDG study.

Conclusion

Clinical history and metabolic features of the adrenal lesion complemented by structural imaging (CT/MRI) features were helpful in favoring the malignant potential of such adrenal mass that triggered the surgical intervention. Even though adrenal oncocytic neoplasm is a rare tumor, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a well-defined adrenal mass.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , , , , . A rare case of functioning adrenocortical oncocytoma presenting as Cushing syndrome. Case Rep Surg 2016 2016:8964070.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . A case of oncocytic adrenocortical neoplasm of borderline (Uncertain) malignant potential. Cureus. 2016;8:e638.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Large but benign adrenal mass: Adrenal oncocytoma. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16:469-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . Adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasm presenting with Cushing's syndrome: A case report. J Med Case Rep. 2008;2:228.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Incidental adrenocortical oncocytoma. Case Rep 2009 pii. bcr1220081405
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Adrenocortical oncocytic tumors: Report of 10 cases and review of the literature. Int J Surg Pathol. 2004;12:231-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Adrenal oncocytoma masquerading as a functional tumor. Indian J Urol. 2007;23:77-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Adrenal masses: Characterization with combined unenhanced and delayed enhanced CT. Radiology. 2002;222:629-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . CT imaging characteristics of oncocytic adrenal neoplasms (OANs): Comparison with adrenocortical carcinomas. Abdom Imaging. 2014;39:86-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Characterization of adrenal masses by using FDG PET: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. Radiology. 2011;259:117-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , . Clinical utility of PET-FDG imaging in differentiation of benign from malignant adrenal masses in lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2001;3:59-64.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , . 18F-FDG PET in evaluation of adrenal lesions in patients with lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:2058-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . FDG-PET and CT characterization of adrenal lesions in cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:29-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , . 18F-FDG PET in characterizing adrenal lesions detected on CT or MRI. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1795-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . Distinction between benign and malignant adrenal masses: Value of T1-weighted chemical-shift MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:579-83.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections