Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-41-3
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstracts
Author Reply
Author's Reply
Book Review
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Continuing Medical Education
Diagnosis
Down the Memory Lane
Editorial
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-41-3
Erratum
Faculty
Free papers: Oral Session
Free papers: Poster Session
From Editor's desk
From The Chair, Scientific Committee
Guest Editorial
Image Challenge
In Memoriam
Interesting Image
Interesting Images
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Message
Message by President Elect, SNM, India
Message by President, SNM, India
Messages
Obituary
Oral
ORAL PRESENTATION
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Pictorial Teaching Essay
POSTER PRESENTATION
President's Message
Presidents’ Wall of Fame
Review
Review Article
Schedule for Paper Presentations
Scientific Program
Secretary's Message
Short Communication
SNM India Guidelines 1.0
Technical Communication
Technical Note
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Interesting Image
39 (
2
); 155-157
doi:
10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_149_23

A Rare Presentation of Extrahepatic Biliary Neuroendocrine Tumor Diagnosed using 68Ga-DOTA-TOC Imaging, But Undetectable on 68Ga-FAPI Imaging

Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET-CT, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Koorma Harini, Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET-CT, AIG Hospitals, 1-66/AIG/2 to 5, Mindspace Road, Gachibowli, Hyderabad - 500 032, Telangana, India. E-mail: kharini0202@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are commonly seen in the small intestine and rarely found within the bile ducts. This low incidence is due to a smaller number of Kulchitsky cells in the extrahepatic biliary tree, which predisposes to the disease. The diagnosis of biliary tree carcinoid preoperatively is very rare, with most cases in the literature being incidentally diagnosed during surgery or being identified on the histopathology report postoperatively. Here, we present an interesting case of an extrahepatic biliary NET which was diagnosed preoperatively.

Keywords

68Ga-DOTA-TOC
68Ga-FAPI-46
extrahepatic biliary neuroendocrine tumors

A 28-year-old female patient presented with complaints of jaundice, abdominal pain, and weight loss. Triphasic computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen showed a soft-tissue lesion probably arising from a common hepatic duct (CHD) and involving primary confluence, showing loss of fat planes with surrounding vascular structures, and suspecting intraductal cholangiocarcinoma. Subsequently, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography revealed a lesion at the hepatic hilum compressing biliary confluence, and dilated intrahepatic biliary radicles which is likely neoplastic in etiology. Later, USG-guided liver SOL biopsy and immunohistochemistry showed features of a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET), grade-1. Overall, consistent with findings of NETs, the patient underwent whole-body 68Ga DOTA-TOC positron emission tomography (PET) CT to look for other possible primary tumors and also for metastatic work-up revealed a high-grade 68Ga-DOTA-TOC tracer avid lesion at the region of hepatic hilum involving neck of gallbladder, compressing CHD, primary biliary confluence causing upstream bilateral IHBRD [Figure 1]. The lesion is abutting left portal vein, right portal vein, and right hepatic artery without any obvious involvement–no other evidence of 68Ga DOTA-TOC tracer avid disease in the rest of the scanned segment of the body.

(a-h) Whole body Maximum intensity projection (MIP), corresponding sections of axial, sagittal, and coronal computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-CT images of 68Ga-DOTA-TOC showing well-defined heterogeneously enhancing intense SSTR expressing lesion at the hepatic hilum (represented by white solid arrow) compressing common hepatic duct with upstream bilateral IHBRD
Figure 1 (a-h) Whole body Maximum intensity projection (MIP), corresponding sections of axial, sagittal, and coronal computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-CT images of 68Ga-DOTA-TOC showing well-defined heterogeneously enhancing intense SSTR expressing lesion at the hepatic hilum (represented by white solid arrow) compressing common hepatic duct with upstream bilateral IHBRD

The following day, 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET CT scan showed no abnormal increased tracer expression [Figure 2].

(a-h) Whole body Maximum intensity projection (MIP), corresponding sections of axial, sagittal, and coronal computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-CT images of 68Ga-FAPI-46 showing well-defined hypodense lesion (represented by white solid arrow) at hepatic hilum compressing common hepatic duct with upstream bilateral IHBRD, showing no abnormal increased FAPI expression
Figure 2 (a-h) Whole body Maximum intensity projection (MIP), corresponding sections of axial, sagittal, and coronal computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-CT images of 68Ga-FAPI-46 showing well-defined hypodense lesion (represented by white solid arrow) at hepatic hilum compressing common hepatic duct with upstream bilateral IHBRD, showing no abnormal increased FAPI expression

After a thorough discussion at a multidisciplinary tumor board, the final consensus was to proceed with surgical resection as the recommended course of action. The patient underwent left hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection and Roux-en-Y-hepaticoje junostomy-postoperative histopathological examination showing features of NET, grade-1. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged.

We reported a sporadic case of preoperatively diagnosed extrahepatic biliary NET (EBNET) from biopsy and identified on 68Ga DOTA-TOC PET/CT imaging. Modlin et al. demonstrated that the most common sites for primary NETs are the gastrointestinal tract (67.5%) and bronchopulmonary system (25.3%) with only 0.1%–0.4% occurring in the extrahepatic bile ducts.[1] 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 95.1%, accuracy of 96.6%, positive predictive value of 98.5%, and negative predictive value of 90.4% in well-differentiated NETs.[2] Although the 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogs used for diagnosing NETs have different affinities for the SSTRs, studies comparing the sensitivities and uptake values of 68Ga-DOTATATE versus 68Ga-DOTATOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE versus 68Ga-DOTANOC have not identified any differences in diagnostic accuracy.[34]

The target for the radiotracer 68Ga-FAPI PET is fibroblast-activated protein, a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed on activated fibroblasts such as cancer-associated fibroblasts which are characterized by strong desmoplastic reaction. 68Ga-labeled FAPIs rapidly bind and internalize into FAP-expressing cells, and undergo rapid renal clearance, resulting in high-contrast images.[5]

Prior studies have reported that NETs are associated with the development of fibrosis.[6] A positive finding of desmoplastic reaction in the context of gastroenteropancreatic NET is revealed by the employment of a 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT scan.[7] The intention behind conducting this 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT imaging is to serve academic pursuits, specifically to identify the presence of desmoplastic reaction in EBNET. In this case, the fact that 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT is negative suggests that EBNET does not demonstrate a desmoplastic reaction. For grade 1 EBNET, 68Ga DOTA-TOC PET/CT positivity is sufficient; however, 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT imaging is performed to look for the presence of desmoplastic reaction as well as any added advantage over 68Ga DOTA-TOC tracer in well-differentiated EBNET’s.

We hope that our study sheds light on the fact that 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT is not particularly useful in EBNET. However, more studies are needed to support the claim that 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT is ineffective in EBNETs.

In summary, an accurate diagnosis of an EBNET can be made before surgery. Better preparation and condition management are made possible by this, which has important implications for treatment planning and patient care. For those with EBNET, a preoperative diagnosis can expedite the medical process and enhance results.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal her identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. , , , . A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer. 2003;97:934-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . The impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging on management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors: Experience from a national referral center in the United Kingdom. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:34-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Comparison of 68Ga-DOTANOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT within patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:364-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , . 68Ga-DOTATOC versus 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in functional imaging of neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1864-70.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , . FAPI PET: Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor use in oncologic and nononcologic disease. Radiology. 2023;306:e220749.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , . Neuroendocrine tumors and fibrosis: An unsolved mystery? Cancer. 2017;123:4770-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . (68) Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Tracer uptake in 28 different kinds of cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:801-5.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections